
Trading Account Comparison: Equiti Microvs Exness Raw Spread
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Raw Spread
What Makes Equiti Micro Different from Exness Raw Spread?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Equiti Micro
The Equiti Micro account provides a straightforward option for traders who prioritize accessibility over obtaining the tightest spreads. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips, with no separate trading commission, no minimum deposit and Market Execution. It should therefore be evaluated around its accessible structure while recognizing its wider spreads compared with other Equiti accounts.
Exness Raw Spread
The Exness Raw Spread account targets traders who place a high priority on tighter spreads and are comfortable with a pricing model that includes a separate commission. Its value is better assessed through total transaction cost rather than spread alone, making it especially relevant to scalping, active trading and strategies where small differences in entry and exit costs can matter.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Equiti Micro | Exness Raw Spread |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Equiti | Exness |
| Account Name | Micro | Raw Spread |
| Account Type | cent | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 1.8 – 2.5 | 0.0 – 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 1.8 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 2.1 | 0.1 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $200 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Classified as suitable for scalping |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:2000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Equiti
Micro

Exness
Raw Spread
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Equiti Micro as an account that requires a more deliberate choice: it offers no minimum deposit and no separate commission, but its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest in our Equiti data. It should therefore be compared directly with Classic, which provides the same commission and deposit advantages with a tighter displayed spread range.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Raw Spread is a more specialized account than Standard or Pro. We see it as suitable for traders who understand how commissions and spreads affect total costs and whose strategies benefit from lower spreads. The correct comparison should be based on the complete transaction cost rather than the spread figure alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓No minimum deposit according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓No separate trading commission on the account
- ✓Straightforward pricing structure based primarily on spread
- ✓Does not require committing to a stated initial deposit amount
- ✓Provides an additional option when comparing Equiti account types before opening an account
Account Advantages
- ✓Low spreads suitable for cost-sensitive strategies
- ✓Suitable for active traders
- ✓Can be practical for scalping strategies
- ✓Clear pricing structure combining spreads and commissions
- ✓Designed for more experienced traders
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among Equiti accounts in our data
- !Classic combines the same zero commission and no minimum deposit with a tighter spread range
- !Standard provides clearly tighter spreads in exchange for a $30 minimum deposit
- !Spread costs can become increasingly important as trading volume or frequency rises
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions must be considered alongside spreads
- !More complex than commission-free accounts
- !Not necessarily the lowest-cost option for every instrument or strategy
- !May not be the most suitable choice for beginners
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders looking for an Equiti account with no minimum deposit
- •Users who prefer not to pay a separate per-lot commission
- •Traders comparing Micro with Classic before choosing an Equiti account
- •Users who prioritize a straightforward account structure over obtaining the tightest spreads
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using scalping strategies
- •Those who place a high priority on low spreads
- •Traders comfortable calculating spreads and commissions together
Detailed Account Analysis
Equiti Micro vs Classic: What Is the Real Difference?
This is the key comparison for Micro because neither account has a separate trading commission or minimum deposit in Broker Alarab data. The clearest difference is spread: Micro is listed at 1.8–2.5 pips, while Classic ranges from 1.4–1.8 pips. Classic therefore has a clear advantage in the displayed spread range. Traders specifically considering Micro should focus on whether the account type suits their needs, because zero commission and no minimum deposit do not give Micro a pricing advantage over Classic based on our figures.
Is the Equiti Micro Account Low Cost Because It Has Zero Commission?
No. The separate commission listed for Micro is $0, but that does not remove spread cost. Its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among the Equiti accounts in our dataset, making spread an important component of total cost, particularly as trading frequency or volume increases. Cost-conscious traders should compare Micro with Classic and Standard rather than using zero commission as the only deciding factor, because both alternatives have tighter displayed spread ranges.
Equiti Micro vs Standard: Is the $30 Minimum Deposit Worth Paying?
Micro has no minimum deposit and offers 1.8–2.5 pip spreads with no separate commission. Standard introduces a $30 minimum deposit but narrows the displayed spread range to 1.2–1.6 pips while keeping commission at $0 according to our data. Traders able to meet the $30 requirement therefore have a clear reason to compare the two accounts from a spread-cost perspective. The trade-off is not commission, but entry requirement versus the displayed pricing range.
Detailed Account Analysis
Raw Spread vs Standard
Raw Spread and Standard use different cost models. Standard relies on spreads without a direct trading commission, while Raw Spread aims to provide lower spreads while adding a trading commission. Standard can therefore be easier for traders who prefer simple pricing, whereas Raw Spread may become more attractive to frequent traders who genuinely benefit from lower spreads after including commission in the total transaction cost.
Raw Spread vs Pro
Pro offers a model without a direct commission and more competitive spreads than basic accounts, while Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost between the spread and commission. The choice depends on instruments, trading volume and frequency. Traders prioritizing simplicity may prefer Pro, while those highly sensitive to spread costs may favor Raw Spread after comparing the complete transaction cost under both pricing models.
Raw Spread vs Zero
Both accounts target traders focused on reducing spread-related costs, but their pricing and commissions vary by account and instrument. There is therefore no single answer that applies to every trader. A better comparison is to select the instruments normally traded and calculate both spread and commission under each account. This helps determine whether Raw Spread or Zero is more cost-efficient for the trader's actual strategy.
Important details about the Equiti Micro account
Zero commission does not mean zero trading cost
Micro has no separate commission in our data, but spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips. Spread therefore remains an important component when evaluating the cost of opening and closing positions.
No minimum deposit does not determine suitable trading capital
Broker Alarab data lists no minimum deposit for Micro. This improves accessibility, but it does not mean every balance is appropriate for a particular strategy, position size or level of risk.
Compare Micro with Classic before choosing
Both accounts have no separate commission and no minimum deposit in our data, but Classic has a tighter displayed spread range. This makes the Micro versus Classic comparison particularly important before selecting the account.
Important details about the Exness Raw Spread account
Low spreads with a separate commission
Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost from the spread and charges it as a per-lot commission. For this reason, traders should compare the combined spread-and-commission cost rather than choosing the account based on spread alone.
Commission depends on the instrument
Exness states that Raw Spread commission can be up to USD 3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, with the exact amount depending on the instrument traded. Commission applies to both directions of the trade, so contract specifications should be checked.
Designed for more active trading
Exness positions Raw Spread for experienced traders, combining ultra-low spreads with market execution and no general limit on the number of open positions. This structure makes it relevant for scalping, active trading and spread-sensitive strategies.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Equiti Micro is 1.8 – 2.5, while Exness Raw Spread shows 0.0 – 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Equiti Micro is $0, compared with $200 for Exness Raw Spread. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Equiti Micro vs Exness Raw Spread
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Equiti Micro and Exness Raw Spread?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Equiti Micro account?+
What is the Equiti Micro spread and commission?+
What is the Equiti Micro minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between Equiti Micro, Classic and Standard?+
What is the Exness Raw Spread account and who is it suitable for?+
How much is the commission on the Exness Raw Spread account?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
