
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Provs IC Markets Standard
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Standard
What Makes Exness Pro Different from IC Markets Standard?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Pro
The Exness Pro account is the commission-free professional option in the Exness lineup, aimed at traders seeking more competitive pricing than the standard accounts without moving to a separate commission model. With higher entry requirements and more advanced execution characteristics, Pro is particularly relevant to active and experienced traders who value pricing and execution quality alongside a straightforward cost structure.
IC Markets Standard
The IC Markets Standard account is the broker’s straightforward pricing option for traders who prefer trading without a separate per-lot commission. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 0.8–1.0 pips, commission is $0, the minimum deposit is $200 and orders use Market Execution. We categorize it for beginners, while comparing Standard with IC Markets Raw accounts becomes increasingly important as trading activity grows.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Pro | IC Markets Standard |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | IC Markets |
| Account Name | Pro | Standard |
| Account Type | standard | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.6 – 1.0 | 0.8 - 1.0 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $200 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Pro

IC Markets
Standard
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Pro as one of the more interesting Exness accounts for traders seeking more competitive spreads without moving to a commission-based pricing model. It can suit active traders, although comparisons with Raw Spread and Zero should focus on total transaction costs rather than spreads alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see IC Markets Standard as better suited to traders who value simple commission-free pricing, particularly beginners who do not want to calculate spread and commission together. However, IC Markets offers several Raw alternatives, making comparison essential. Its 0.8–1.0 pip range can matter more as volume and trading frequency increase, so zero commission alone should not determine the choice.
Account Advantages
- ✓More competitive spreads than basic account types
- ✓No direct trading commission
- ✓Suitable for more experienced traders
- ✓Can be practical for active traders
- ✓Combines simple pricing with more professional trading conditions
Account Advantages
- ✓No separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Spreads range from 0.8–1.0 pips in our data
- ✓Straightforward cost structure that is easier for beginners to understand
- ✓Minimum deposit is $200 according to our data
- ✓Provides a clear alternative for traders who do not want tight-spread pricing with a separate commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !May not be ideal for beginners seeking the simplest account
- !Requires careful comparison with Raw Spread and Zero
- !Actual costs vary by instrument and market conditions
- !Its benefits may be more noticeable for active traders
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Spread range is wider than the Raw accounts listed in our data
- !Commission-free does not mean the transaction has no cost
- !Spread cost can become more important for scalping and frequent trading
- !Active traders should compare Standard with Raw Spread and the professional Raw tiers before choosing
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Experienced traders
- •Traders seeking more competitive spreads without a direct commission
- •Active traders placing frequent trades
- •Those looking for an alternative between Standard and commission-based accounts
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners looking for an IC Markets account with easy-to-understand pricing
- •Traders who prefer not to pay a separate commission per lot
- •Lower-frequency traders who are not focused exclusively on obtaining the tightest possible spread
- •Users who prefer a primarily spread-based cost model instead of combining spread and commission
Detailed Account Analysis
Pro vs Standard: What Is the Main Difference?
The key difference is that Pro targets traders who are more sensitive to spread costs, while Standard focuses on simplicity and ease of use. Both operate without a direct trading commission, making spreads and execution conditions more important in the comparison. Standard may be sufficient for traders placing fewer trades, while Pro conditions can have a greater impact on overall costs as trading frequency and position sizes increase.
Pro vs Raw Spread
Pro and Raw Spread both appeal to traders focused on trading costs, but they use different pricing structures. Pro maintains a commission-free model with more competitive spreads, while Raw Spread combines low spreads with a trading commission. Looking at spreads alone is therefore insufficient. Traders should calculate the complete transaction cost for their instruments, trade sizes and trading frequency before deciding which account is more cost-efficient.
Is Pro Suitable for Active Traders?
Pro can suit active traders because spread costs become increasingly important as trading frequency or position size grows. At the same time, the account retains a model without a direct trading commission, making cost calculations simpler than on some commission-based accounts. Active traders should still compare Pro with Raw Spread and Zero using the specific instruments they actually trade before selecting an account.
Detailed Account Analysis
IC Markets Standard vs Raw Spread: Which Account Is Better?
This is one of the most important comparisons when choosing an IC Markets account. According to Broker Alarab data, Standard uses a 0.8–1.0 pip spread range with no separate commission, while Raw Spread uses 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Both have a $200 minimum deposit in our data, so the entry requirement does not decide the comparison. Standard provides simpler pricing, while Raw Spread reduces the spread in exchange for commission. The better option depends on lot size, trading frequency and the total cost produced by each structure.
Is the IC Markets Standard Account Good for Beginners?
Broker Alarab categorizes Standard for beginners, and one reason this type of account can suit newer traders is the clarity of its cost structure. There is no separate per-lot commission, allowing traders to focus primarily on the spread when understanding entry and exit costs. This does not reduce trading risk or guarantee that Standard is always the cheapest account. Its main advantage for beginners is pricing simplicity, while Raw accounts can be compared later as trading size and frequency increase.
When Does a Raw Account Make More Sense Than Standard?
As traders become more spread-sensitive or increase their transaction frequency and trading volume, comparing Standard with the Raw accounts becomes more important. Standard is listed at 0.8–1.0 pips in our data, while several Raw options use tighter ranges with separate commissions. Traders should translate both the spread difference and commission into an effective cost at their expected lot size. This produces a more useful decision than relying only on labels such as commission-free or tight spread.
Important details about the Exness Pro account
Professional pricing without a trading commission
Pro differs from Raw Spread and Zero because it combines pricing aimed at experienced traders with no separate trading commission. It is therefore worth comparing for traders who prefer spread-based costs rather than a per-lot commission model.
Pro stands out for its execution options
The Pro account can support instant or market execution depending on the instrument, account currency and applicable conditions. Instant execution can result in a requote when the requested price is no longer available.
Built for active and advanced trading styles
Exness classifies Pro as a professional account for experienced traders and supports styles ranging from day trading to automated strategies. Minimum trading volume starts from 0.01 lot on supported instruments.
Important details about the IC Markets Standard account
Commission-free does not mean free trading
Standard has a $0 commission in our data, but its 0.8–1.0 pip spread range remains an important component of transaction cost and should be included in comparisons.
The minimum deposit in our data is $200
Broker Alarab lists a $200 minimum deposit for Standard. This is an account requirement rather than a recommendation for suitable trading capital or risk.
Compare Standard and Raw using total trading cost
The presence of commission on a Raw account or its absence on Standard does not determine the cheaper option by itself. Spread differences and commission should be compared using expected volume and transaction frequency.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Pro is 0.6 – 1.0, while IC Markets Standard shows 0.8 - 1.0. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Pro is $200, compared with $200 for IC Markets Standard. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Pro vs IC Markets Standard
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Pro and IC Markets Standard?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Pro account and who is it suitable for?+
Does the Exness Pro account charge a trading commission?+
What is the difference between Exness Pro and Raw Spread?+
Is Exness Pro better than the Standard account?+
What is the IC Markets Standard account?+
What is the IC Markets Standard spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
