
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Provs Ultima Markets Standard
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Standard
What Makes Exness Pro Different from Ultima Markets Standard?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Pro
The Exness Pro account is the commission-free professional option in the Exness lineup, aimed at traders seeking more competitive pricing than the standard accounts without moving to a separate commission model. With higher entry requirements and more advanced execution characteristics, Pro is particularly relevant to active and experienced traders who value pricing and execution quality alongside a straightforward cost structure.
Ultima Markets Standard
The Ultima Markets Standard account uses straightforward spread-based pricing without a separate per-lot commission. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 1.0–1.5 pips, commission is $0, the minimum deposit is $50 and orders use Market Execution, making Standard an important comparison point against ECN for traders balancing simpler costs with tighter spreads.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Pro | Ultima Markets Standard |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | Ultima Markets |
| Account Name | Pro | Standard |
| Account Type | standard | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FSC | FSCA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.6 – 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.5 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0.1 | 1 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $50 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | WebTrader | Mobile App |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FSC | FSCA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:2000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Pro

Ultima Markets
Standard
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Pro as one of the more interesting Exness accounts for traders seeking more competitive spreads without moving to a commission-based pricing model. It can suit active traders, although comparisons with Raw Spread and Zero should focus on total transaction costs rather than spreads alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Ultima Markets Standard as suitable for traders who want straightforward pricing without a separate commission. Because ECN carries the same $50 minimum deposit in our data, comparing the two is essential. Standard is simpler to price, while ECN provides tighter spreads for a commission, so the choice should reflect trading size and frequency rather than deposit alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓More competitive spreads than basic account types
- ✓No direct trading commission
- ✓Suitable for more experienced traders
- ✓Can be practical for active traders
- ✓Combines simple pricing with more professional trading conditions
Account Advantages
- ✓No separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Spreads range from 1.0–1.5 pips in our dataset
- ✓The minimum deposit is $50
- ✓Straightforward pricing structure based primarily on spread
- ✓Easy to compare directly with ECN when choosing a pricing model
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !May not be ideal for beginners seeking the simplest account
- !Requires careful comparison with Raw Spread and Zero
- !Actual costs vary by instrument and market conditions
- !Its benefits may be more noticeable for active traders
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The displayed spread range is wider than ECN in our data
- !ECN carries the same $50 minimum deposit requirement
- !No separate commission does not mean trading is cost-free
- !The ECN pricing model becomes increasingly important to compare as trading volume or frequency rises
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Experienced traders
- •Traders seeking more competitive spreads without a direct commission
- •Active traders placing frequent trades
- •Those looking for an alternative between Standard and commission-based accounts
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders who prefer an account without a separate per-lot commission
- •Users looking for an Ultima Markets account with easy-to-understand pricing
- •Beginners and traders who prefer a spread-based pricing model
- •Traders who do not want to calculate a separate commission alongside trading volume
Detailed Account Analysis
Pro vs Standard: What Is the Main Difference?
The key difference is that Pro targets traders who are more sensitive to spread costs, while Standard focuses on simplicity and ease of use. Both operate without a direct trading commission, making spreads and execution conditions more important in the comparison. Standard may be sufficient for traders placing fewer trades, while Pro conditions can have a greater impact on overall costs as trading frequency and position sizes increase.
Pro vs Raw Spread
Pro and Raw Spread both appeal to traders focused on trading costs, but they use different pricing structures. Pro maintains a commission-free model with more competitive spreads, while Raw Spread combines low spreads with a trading commission. Looking at spreads alone is therefore insufficient. Traders should calculate the complete transaction cost for their instruments, trade sizes and trading frequency before deciding which account is more cost-efficient.
Is Pro Suitable for Active Traders?
Pro can suit active traders because spread costs become increasingly important as trading frequency or position size grows. At the same time, the account retains a model without a direct trading commission, making cost calculations simpler than on some commission-based accounts. Active traders should still compare Pro with Raw Spread and Zero using the specific instruments they actually trade before selecting an account.
Detailed Account Analysis
Ultima Markets Standard vs ECN: Which Account Costs Less?
This is the most important Ultima Markets account comparison because Standard and ECN carry the same $50 minimum deposit in Broker Alarab data. Standard has spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips with no separate commission, while ECN narrows the range to 0.0–0.3 pips for a $5-per-lot commission. Deposit size therefore does not decide between them. Traders need to compare the spread difference with commission at their actual trading volume to determine which pricing model may produce the lower overall transaction cost.
Is the Ultima Markets Standard Account Really Commission Free?
The separate trading commission listed for Standard is $0, meaning our data does not apply an additional per-lot trading commission to the account. That does not make each transaction free because the 1.0–1.5 pip spread remains part of entry and exit cost. Searching for a commission-free account should therefore go beyond the commission figure and include spread, particularly when comparing Standard with the tighter-spread, commission-based ECN account.
Is Ultima Markets Standard Suitable for Beginners?
Standard can be easier for newer traders to understand because its pricing does not add a separate per-lot commission, while the minimum deposit in our data is $50. Simpler pricing does not automatically make it the best account for every beginner, however. Traders still need to understand spreads, leverage, position sizing and risk management. With ECN carrying the same minimum deposit, understanding spread-only versus spread-plus-commission pricing is particularly useful before choosing.
Important details about the Exness Pro account
Professional pricing without a trading commission
Pro differs from Raw Spread and Zero because it combines pricing aimed at experienced traders with no separate trading commission. It is therefore worth comparing for traders who prefer spread-based costs rather than a per-lot commission model.
Pro stands out for its execution options
The Pro account can support instant or market execution depending on the instrument, account currency and applicable conditions. Instant execution can result in a requote when the requested price is no longer available.
Built for active and advanced trading styles
Exness classifies Pro as a professional account for experienced traders and supports styles ranging from day trading to automated strategies. Minimum trading volume starts from 0.01 lot on supported instruments.
Important details about the Ultima Markets Standard account
$0 commission does not mean zero trading cost
Standard has no separate trading commission in our data, but its 1.0–1.5 pip spread remains part of transaction cost and should be included in any meaningful account comparison.
The $50 minimum deposit is not suggested trading capital
Broker Alarab data lists a $50 minimum deposit for Standard. This is an account requirement rather than guidance on appropriate capital for a particular strategy, position size or risk level.
Compare Standard with ECN before opening an account
Both accounts carry the same minimum deposit in our data but use clearly different pricing models. Standard has no separate commission, while ECN reduces spreads and adds a per-lot trading commission.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Pro is 0.6 – 1.0, while Ultima Markets Standard shows 1.0 - 1.5. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Pro is $200, compared with $50 for Ultima Markets Standard. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Pro vs Ultima Markets Standard
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Pro and Ultima Markets Standard?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Pro account and who is it suitable for?+
Does the Exness Pro account charge a trading commission?+
What is the difference between Exness Pro and Raw Spread?+
Is Exness Pro better than the Standard account?+
What is the Ultima Markets Standard account?+
What is the Ultima Markets Standard spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
