
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Raw Spreadvs XM Micro
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Micro
What Makes Exness Raw Spread Different from XM Micro?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Raw Spread
The Exness Raw Spread account targets traders who place a high priority on tighter spreads and are comfortable with a pricing model that includes a separate commission. Its value is better assessed through total transaction cost rather than spread alone, making it especially relevant to scalping, active trading and strategies where small differences in entry and exit costs can matter.
XM Micro
The XM Micro account is designed for traders who want to trade with smaller position sizes while using a live trading environment. Based on our account data, it has spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit, making it worth considering for beginners and traders focused on controlling position size and risk.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Raw Spread | XM Micro |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | XM |
| Account Name | Raw Spread | Micro |
| Account Type | raw | cent |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 – 0.3 | 1.0 – 1.5 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 1 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 1.2 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Classified as suitable for scalping | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Raw Spread

XM
Micro
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Raw Spread is a more specialized account than Standard or Pro. We see it as suitable for traders who understand how commissions and spreads affect total costs and whose strategies benefit from lower spreads. The correct comparison should be based on the complete transaction cost rather than the spread figure alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see the XM Micro account as most relevant to beginners and traders who prioritize smaller position sizing over finding the tightest possible spread. Its $5 minimum deposit and commission-free structure are straightforward, but spread-sensitive or more active traders should compare Micro directly with XM Ultra Low and Zero before choosing an account.
Account Advantages
- ✓Low spreads suitable for cost-sensitive strategies
- ✓Suitable for active traders
- ✓Can be practical for scalping strategies
- ✓Clear pricing structure combining spreads and commissions
- ✓Designed for more experienced traders
Account Advantages
- ✓Supports smaller trade sizing and more gradual control of market exposure
- ✓No separate trading commission based on our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Can suit traders moving from demo to live trading
- ✓Provides a practical way to learn position sizing and risk control
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions must be considered alongside spreads
- !More complex than commission-free accounts
- !Not necessarily the lowest-cost option for every instrument or strategy
- !May not be the most suitable choice for beginners
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.0–1.5 pip spread is not the lowest available across XM account types
- !May be less attractive to active traders focused primarily on transaction costs
- !Smaller position sizes do not remove leverage or market risk
- !Should be compared with Ultra Low and Zero when tighter spreads are the priority
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using scalping strategies
- •Those who place a high priority on low spreads
- •Traders comfortable calculating spreads and commissions together
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners who want to start live trading with smaller position sizes
- •Traders learning practical position sizing and money management
- •Users who prefer an account without a separate trading commission
- •Traders looking for an XM account with a $5 minimum deposit
Detailed Account Analysis
Raw Spread vs Standard
Raw Spread and Standard use different cost models. Standard relies on spreads without a direct trading commission, while Raw Spread aims to provide lower spreads while adding a trading commission. Standard can therefore be easier for traders who prefer simple pricing, whereas Raw Spread may become more attractive to frequent traders who genuinely benefit from lower spreads after including commission in the total transaction cost.
Raw Spread vs Pro
Pro offers a model without a direct commission and more competitive spreads than basic accounts, while Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost between the spread and commission. The choice depends on instruments, trading volume and frequency. Traders prioritizing simplicity may prefer Pro, while those highly sensitive to spread costs may favor Raw Spread after comparing the complete transaction cost under both pricing models.
Raw Spread vs Zero
Both accounts target traders focused on reducing spread-related costs, but their pricing and commissions vary by account and instrument. There is therefore no single answer that applies to every trader. A better comparison is to select the instruments normally traded and calculate both spread and commission under each account. This helps determine whether Raw Spread or Zero is more cost-efficient for the trader's actual strategy.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Micro vs Standard: What Is the Important Difference?
Micro and Standard have similar headline costs in our account data: both show spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit. The more meaningful distinction is how the account is used and the position sizes it supports. Micro is more relevant to traders who want smaller sizing and gradual control over exposure, while Standard is closer to conventional standard-lot trading. The decision should therefore be based on the position-sizing structure you actually need rather than simply assuming Micro is only a beginner account.
XM Micro vs Ultra Low: Is the Lower Spread Better?
Our account data shows Micro at 1.0–1.5 pips and Ultra Low at 0.6–1.0 pips, with both accounts carrying no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit. Ultra Low can therefore look more attractive when spread is the main consideration, but Micro serves a different purpose through smaller trade sizing. Traders focused on controlling position size may still prefer Micro, while those becoming more sensitive to transaction costs should compare the effective cost of both accounts.
XM Micro vs Zero: Position Size or Pricing Model?
The difference between Micro and Zero goes beyond the account names. Micro uses a commission-free pricing structure with spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, while our data lists Zero at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. They therefore target different priorities. Micro can make more sense for traders focused on smaller sizing and simple pricing, whereas Zero becomes more relevant to spread-sensitive traders who are comfortable evaluating total transaction cost after commission.
Important details about the Exness Raw Spread account
Low spreads with a separate commission
Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost from the spread and charges it as a per-lot commission. For this reason, traders should compare the combined spread-and-commission cost rather than choosing the account based on spread alone.
Commission depends on the instrument
Exness states that Raw Spread commission can be up to USD 3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, with the exact amount depending on the instrument traded. Commission applies to both directions of the trade, so contract specifications should be checked.
Designed for more active trading
Exness positions Raw Spread for experienced traders, combining ultra-low spreads with market execution and no general limit on the number of open positions. This structure makes it relevant for scalping, active trading and spread-sensitive strategies.
Important details about the XM Micro account
A Micro account does not make trading low risk
The ability to use smaller trade sizes can help control exposure, but it does not prevent losses. Position size should still reflect account equity, leverage and the amount of capital a trader is prepared to risk.
Micro does not have the lowest XM spread in our data
Broker Alarab data lists Micro spreads at 1.0–1.5 pips. Ultra Low has a tighter displayed range, while Zero combines lower spreads with a commission, so pricing should be compared according to trading style.
Minimum deposit is not the same as suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Micro. That figure represents the account entry requirement and should not be interpreted as the amount of capital appropriate for every strategy or risk level.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, while XM Micro shows 1.0 – 1.5. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Raw Spread is $200, compared with $5 for XM Micro. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Raw Spread vs XM Micro
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and XM Micro?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Raw Spread account and who is it suitable for?+
How much is the commission on the Exness Raw Spread account?+
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and Zero?+
Is the Exness Raw Spread account good for scalping?+
What is the XM Micro account?+
What is the XM Micro account minimum deposit?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
