Account One01
Raw Spread
Advertised Spread
0.0 – 0.3
Commission
Not specified
Minimum Deposit
$200
Detailed Trading Account Comparison
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Raw Spreadvs XM Ultra Low
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.
Account Two02
Ultra Low
Advertised Spread
0.6 – 1.0
Commission
$0
Minimum Deposit
$5
ACCOUNT OVERVIEW
What Makes Exness Raw Spread Different from XM Ultra Low?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Raw Spread
The Exness Raw Spread account targets traders who place a high priority on tighter spreads and are comfortable with a pricing model that includes a separate commission. Its value is better assessed through total transaction cost rather than spread alone, making it especially relevant to scalping, active trading and strategies where small differences in entry and exit costs can matter.
XM Ultra Low
The XM Ultra Low account targets traders looking for lower spreads while keeping a commission-free pricing structure. Based on Broker Alarab account data, spreads range from 0.6–1.0 pips, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution, making Ultra Low a strong alternative to Standard and an important account to compare directly with XM Zero on trading costs.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
Exness
Raw Spread
XM
Ultra Low
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Exness
Exness
XM
XM
Account Name
Exness
Raw Spread
XM
Ultra Low
Account Type
Exness
raw
XM
standard
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
Exness
FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC
XM
CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Exness
0.0 – 0.3
XM
0.6 – 1.0
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Exness
0
XM
0.6
Average Recorded Spread
Exness
0.1
XM
0.8
Advertised Commission
Exness
Not specified
XM
$0
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Exness
$200
XM
$5
Order Execution Method
Exness
Market Execution
XM
Market Execution
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
Exness
MT4 | MT5
XM
MT4 | MT5
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
Exness
Classified as suitable for scalping
XM
Not classified in this category
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Exness
FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC
XM
CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Exness
1:2000
XM
1:1000
Open a Trading Account
Exness
Open Account ↗Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Raw Spread | XM Ultra Low |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | XM |
| Account Name | Raw Spread | Ultra Low |
| Account Type | raw | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 – 0.3 | 0.6 – 1.0 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 0.6 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Classified as suitable for scalping | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Information is presented as recorded by Broker Alarab. Spread and commission figures should not be treated as directly comparable without verifying the instrument, pricing units and fee structure.
EXPERT ANALYSIS
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.
Exness
Raw Spread
XM
Ultra Low
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Raw Spread is a more specialized account than Standard or Pro. We see it as suitable for traders who understand how commissions and spreads affect total costs and whose strategies benefit from lower spreads. The correct comparison should be based on the complete transaction cost rather than the spread figure alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see XM Ultra Low as one of the stronger XM options for traders seeking a balance between tighter spreads and commission-free pricing. Its 0.6–1.0 pip range is more competitive than Standard in our data, but highly active or cost-sensitive traders should still compare Ultra Low with Zero using total transaction cost rather than spread alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓Low spreads suitable for cost-sensitive strategies
- ✓Suitable for active traders
- ✓Can be practical for scalping strategies
- ✓Clear pricing structure combining spreads and commissions
- ✓Designed for more experienced traders
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.6–1.0 pips based on Broker Alarab account data
- ✓No separate trading commission according to our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Tighter displayed spread range than XM Standard in our comparison data
- ✓Combines relatively low spreads with a simpler commission-free pricing model
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions must be considered alongside spreads
- !More complex than commission-free accounts
- !Not necessarily the lowest-cost option for every instrument or strategy
- !May not be the most suitable choice for beginners
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The displayed spread range is not as tight as XM Zero in our account data
- !Active traders may need to compare total cost with the commission-based Zero account
- !The spread remains an important trading cost even without a separate commission
- !Choosing it based on the Ultra Low name alone can be misleading without comparing other XM accounts
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using scalping strategies
- •Those who place a high priority on low spreads
- •Traders comfortable calculating spreads and commissions together
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders looking for tighter spreads without a separate trading commission
- •Users who find the Standard account spread relatively high for their trading style
- •Traders who prefer simpler pricing over a commission-based account structure
- •Anyone comparing a lower-spread XM option with the XM Zero account before opening an account
Detailed Account Analysis
Raw Spread vs Standard
Raw Spread and Standard use different cost models. Standard relies on spreads without a direct trading commission, while Raw Spread aims to provide lower spreads while adding a trading commission. Standard can therefore be easier for traders who prefer simple pricing, whereas Raw Spread may become more attractive to frequent traders who genuinely benefit from lower spreads after including commission in the total transaction cost.
Raw Spread vs Pro
Pro offers a model without a direct commission and more competitive spreads than basic accounts, while Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost between the spread and commission. The choice depends on instruments, trading volume and frequency. Traders prioritizing simplicity may prefer Pro, while those highly sensitive to spread costs may favor Raw Spread after comparing the complete transaction cost under both pricing models.
Raw Spread vs Zero
Both accounts target traders focused on reducing spread-related costs, but their pricing and commissions vary by account and instrument. There is therefore no single answer that applies to every trader. A better comparison is to select the instruments normally traded and calculate both spread and commission under each account. This helps determine whether Raw Spread or Zero is more cost-efficient for the trader's actual strategy.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Ultra Low vs Standard: Where Does Ultra Low Have the Advantage?
The clearest Ultra Low advantage appears when its spread is compared directly with Standard. Broker Alarab data lists Ultra Low at 0.6–1.0 pips versus 1.0–1.5 pips for Standard, while neither account has a separate trading commission and both have a $5 minimum deposit. Ultra Low therefore has a clear advantage in the displayed spread range in our dataset. Traders who do not specifically need another feature of Standard should compare Ultra Low first when reducing spread cost is a priority.
XM Ultra Low vs Zero: Which Account Costs Less?
This comparison is more complex because the accounts use different pricing models. Ultra Low has spreads of 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate commission in our data, while Zero is listed at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Zero cannot therefore be considered cheaper simply because its displayed spread is lower. Traders need to compare spread and commission together, especially when trading frequently or using larger position sizes.
Is the XM Ultra Low Account Good for Active Trading?
Ultra Low can be attractive to active traders because its displayed spread range is tighter than Standard in our data and there is no separate trading commission. Suitability still depends on trading style. As trade frequency increases, relatively small cost differences become more important and comparison with Zero becomes essential. Traders who prefer costs concentrated in the spread may find Ultra Low simpler, while others may find Zero more competitive after calculating their total transaction cost.
Important details about the Exness Raw Spread account
Low spreads with a separate commission
Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost from the spread and charges it as a per-lot commission. For this reason, traders should compare the combined spread-and-commission cost rather than choosing the account based on spread alone.
Commission depends on the instrument
Exness states that Raw Spread commission can be up to USD 3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, with the exact amount depending on the instrument traded. Commission applies to both directions of the trade, so contract specifications should be checked.
Designed for more active trading
Exness positions Raw Spread for experienced traders, combining ultra-low spreads with market execution and no general limit on the number of open positions. This structure makes it relevant for scalping, active trading and spread-sensitive strategies.
Important details about the XM Ultra Low account
Ultra Low does not mean zero spread
Broker Alarab data lists the XM Ultra Low spread at 0.6–1.0 pips. Traders should therefore distinguish the Ultra Low name from the XM Zero account, which has a different displayed spread range and uses a per-lot commission model.
Compare total cost rather than spread alone
The lack of a separate commission makes Ultra Low pricing relatively easy to understand, but comparison with Zero should include both spread and commission. The account with the tighter spread is not automatically cheaper for every trade size or strategy.
Minimum deposit does not define suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Ultra Low, but this is an account requirement rather than a recommendation for trading capital. Suitable funding depends on position size, leverage, strategy and individual risk limits.
DECISION GUIDE
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
01
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, while XM Ultra Low shows 0.6 – 1.0. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
02
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Raw Spread is $200, compared with $5 for XM Ultra Low. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
03
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
04
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FAQs About Exness Raw Spread vs XM Ultra Low
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and XM Ultra Low?+
The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, compared with 0.6 – 1.0 for XM Ultra Low. The advertised commissions are Not specified and $0, respectively. You should also consider execution conditions, deposit requirements and account availability.
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Not necessarily. Trading costs should be evaluated using both spreads and commissions, while considering the financial instrument, position size and execution conditions.
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
Yes. Broker Alarab allows traders to compare accounts from the same broker or from different brokers.
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
Review the broker's official account specifications, applicable legal entity and trading conditions. Spreads, commissions and leverage may vary by instrument, account and jurisdiction.
What is the Exness Raw Spread account and who is it suitable for?+
Exness Raw Spread is a professional account focused on providing tight spreads in exchange for a separate trading commission. This pricing structure makes it particularly relevant to active traders, scalpers and spread-sensitive strategies, although the spread and commission should always be combined when evaluating the true cost of a trade.
How much is the commission on the Exness Raw Spread account?+
The Raw Spread commission depends on the instrument traded. Exness states that commission can be up to $3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, meaning traders should consider the cost of both opening and closing a position together with the spread. The exact commission can vary by instrument.
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and Zero?+
Both accounts target traders who value tight spreads and both use separate commission structures, but their pricing differs by account and instrument. Zero focuses on the availability of zero spreads on eligible instruments during specified periods, while Raw Spread focuses on consistently tight raw-style pricing. The more useful comparison is the total cost on the instruments a trader actually uses.
Is the Exness Raw Spread account good for scalping?+
Raw Spread can be suitable for scalping because tighter spreads can matter when a strategy executes many trades or targets relatively small price movements. Its suitability still depends on the total cost after commission, the instrument traded, position size, market conditions and the execution requirements of the strategy.
What is the XM Ultra Low account?+
The XM Ultra Low account is designed around tighter spreads while maintaining a pricing model with no separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data. We list spreads at 0.6–1.0 pips, a $5 minimum deposit and Market Execution. The account becomes particularly interesting when compared with XM Standard on spread cost.
What is the XM Ultra Low account spread and commission?+
Broker Alarab account data lists XM Ultra Low spreads at 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate trading commission. This is tighter than the 1.0–1.5 pip Standard range in our data. XM Zero has a still lower displayed spread range but charges a per-lot commission, so traders should compare total transaction cost rather than spread alone.
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.