
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Raw Spreadvs XM Zero
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Zero
What Makes Exness Raw Spread Different from XM Zero?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Raw Spread
The Exness Raw Spread account targets traders who place a high priority on tighter spreads and are comfortable with a pricing model that includes a separate commission. Its value is better assessed through total transaction cost rather than spread alone, making it especially relevant to scalping, active trading and strategies where small differences in entry and exit costs can matter.
XM Zero
The XM Zero account targets traders who prioritize tight spreads and are comfortable with a separate commission-based pricing model. Based on Broker Alarab account data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips, commission is $7 per lot, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution, making Zero distinctly different from XM Standard and Ultra Low.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Raw Spread | XM Zero |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | XM |
| Account Name | Raw Spread | Zero |
| Account Type | raw | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 – 0.3 | 0.0 – 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Classified as suitable for scalping | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Raw Spread

XM
Zero
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Raw Spread is a more specialized account than Standard or Pro. We see it as suitable for traders who understand how commissions and spreads affect total costs and whose strategies benefit from lower spreads. The correct comparison should be based on the complete transaction cost rather than the spread figure alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see XM Zero as particularly relevant to active and spread-sensitive traders rather than those simply looking for the easiest pricing model. Its 0.0–0.3 pip range is the tightest among the XM accounts in our data, but the $7-per-lot commission means the real comparison should be based on total cost versus Ultra Low and Standard.
Account Advantages
- ✓Low spreads suitable for cost-sensitive strategies
- ✓Suitable for active traders
- ✓Can be practical for scalping strategies
- ✓Clear pricing structure combining spreads and commissions
- ✓Designed for more experienced traders
Account Advantages
- ✓Displayed spread range of 0.0–0.3 pips based on Broker Alarab data
- ✓Tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our dataset
- ✓Can suit active and spread-sensitive traders
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Separates part of the trading cost into a clearly stated per-lot commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions must be considered alongside spreads
- !More complex than commission-free accounts
- !Not necessarily the lowest-cost option for every instrument or strategy
- !May not be the most suitable choice for beginners
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a $7-per-lot trading commission according to our account data
- !Tighter spreads do not guarantee the lowest total cost on every trade
- !Its pricing model requires traders to evaluate spread and commission together
- !Ultra Low may be simpler for traders who prefer no separate commission
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using scalping strategies
- •Those who place a high priority on low spreads
- •Traders comfortable calculating spreads and commissions together
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders who place a high priority on tight spreads
- •Active traders comparing execution costs across a larger number of trades
- •Users comfortable with part of their trading cost being charged as a defined per-lot commission
- •Traders directly comparing XM’s tighter-spread Zero account with Ultra Low
Detailed Account Analysis
Raw Spread vs Standard
Raw Spread and Standard use different cost models. Standard relies on spreads without a direct trading commission, while Raw Spread aims to provide lower spreads while adding a trading commission. Standard can therefore be easier for traders who prefer simple pricing, whereas Raw Spread may become more attractive to frequent traders who genuinely benefit from lower spreads after including commission in the total transaction cost.
Raw Spread vs Pro
Pro offers a model without a direct commission and more competitive spreads than basic accounts, while Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost between the spread and commission. The choice depends on instruments, trading volume and frequency. Traders prioritizing simplicity may prefer Pro, while those highly sensitive to spread costs may favor Raw Spread after comparing the complete transaction cost under both pricing models.
Raw Spread vs Zero
Both accounts target traders focused on reducing spread-related costs, but their pricing and commissions vary by account and instrument. There is therefore no single answer that applies to every trader. A better comparison is to select the instruments normally traded and calculate both spread and commission under each account. This helps determine whether Raw Spread or Zero is more cost-efficient for the trader's actual strategy.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Zero vs Ultra Low: Which Account Has Lower Trading Costs?
This is the key comparison when evaluating XM Zero. Broker Alarab data lists Zero spreads at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission, while Ultra Low is listed at 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate commission. Zero therefore has a clear advantage in displayed spread range, but that does not prove it is cheaper overall. Traders should add the Zero commission to the spread cost and compare the result with Ultra Low according to instrument, trade size and trading frequency.
XM Zero vs Standard: Is the Lower Spread Worth the Commission?
The two accounts use clearly different pricing models. Our data lists Standard at 1.0–1.5 pips with no separate trading commission, compared with 0.0–0.3 pips and a $7-per-lot commission for Zero. Looking at spread alone favors Zero, but a proper cost comparison must include commission. Standard provides simpler commission-free pricing, while Zero gives spread-sensitive traders a tighter displayed range in exchange for a separate and measurable trading charge.
Is the XM Zero Account Good for Scalping and Active Trading?
The tighter displayed spread range makes XM Zero worth evaluating for active traders and strategies that are particularly sensitive to entry and exit costs. Suitability cannot be determined from spread alone, however. As trading frequency and volume increase, the $7-per-lot commission becomes an increasingly important part of total cost. Active traders should therefore compare the effective cost of Zero with Ultra Low using their own position sizes and trading frequency.
Important details about the Exness Raw Spread account
Low spreads with a separate commission
Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost from the spread and charges it as a per-lot commission. For this reason, traders should compare the combined spread-and-commission cost rather than choosing the account based on spread alone.
Commission depends on the instrument
Exness states that Raw Spread commission can be up to USD 3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, with the exact amount depending on the instrument traded. Commission applies to both directions of the trade, so contract specifications should be checked.
Designed for more active trading
Exness positions Raw Spread for experienced traders, combining ultra-low spreads with market execution and no general limit on the number of open positions. This structure makes it relevant for scalping, active trading and spread-sensitive strategies.
Important details about the XM Zero account
Zero does not mean zero trading cost
The account name and tight spread range do not mean trading is free. Our data lists spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips together with a $7-per-lot commission, so both components need to be included when evaluating cost.
The lowest spread does not always mean the cheapest account
Zero has the tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our data, but Ultra Low has no separate trading commission. Total cost can therefore differ according to trade size, instrument and trading frequency.
Minimum deposit does not define suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Zero, but this is an account requirement rather than a recommended trading balance. Capital and position size should reflect strategy, leverage and acceptable risk.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, while XM Zero shows 0.0 – 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Raw Spread is $200, compared with $5 for XM Zero. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Raw Spread vs XM Zero
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and XM Zero?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Raw Spread account and who is it suitable for?+
How much is the commission on the Exness Raw Spread account?+
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and Zero?+
Is the Exness Raw Spread account good for scalping?+
What is the XM Zero account?+
What is the XM Zero spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
