Broker Alarab
Detailed Trading Account Comparison

Trading Account Comparison: Exness Raw Spreadvs XM Zero

Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.

ACCOUNT OVERVIEW

What Makes Exness Raw Spread Different from XM Zero?

Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.

Exness Raw Spread

The Exness Raw Spread account targets traders who place a high priority on tighter spreads and are comfortable with a pricing model that includes a separate commission. Its value is better assessed through total transaction cost rather than spread alone, making it especially relevant to scalping, active trading and strategies where small differences in entry and exit costs can matter.

XM Zero

The XM Zero account targets traders who prioritize tight spreads and are comfortable with a separate commission-based pricing model. Based on Broker Alarab account data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips, commission is $7 per lot, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution, making Zero distinctly different from XM Standard and Ultra Low.

SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON

Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms

Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.

Exness
Raw Spread
XM
Zero

01 — Basic Account Information

Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.

Broker

Exness
Exness
XM
XM

Account Name

Exness
Raw Spread
XM
Zero

Account Type

Exness
raw
XM
raw

Broker Regulatory Licenses

Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.

Exness
FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC
XM
CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC

02 — Spreads and Trading Costs

Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.

Advertised Spread Range

Exness
0.0 – 0.3
XM
0.0 – 0.3

Minimum Recorded Spread

Based on the available account information.

Exness
0
XM
0

Average Recorded Spread

Exness
0.1
XM
0.2

Advertised Commission

Exness
Not specified
XM
Not specified

03 — Deposits and Execution

Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.

Minimum Deposit

Exness
$200
XM
$5

Order Execution Method

Exness
Market Execution
XM
Market Execution

Trading Platforms

Available platforms may differ by account type.

Exness
MT4 | MT5
XM
MT4 | MT5

04 — Account Features and Conditions

Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.

Scalping Suitability

An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.

Exness
Classified as suitable for scalping
XM
Not classified in this category

05 — Broker Information and Regulation

Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.

Listed Regulatory Licenses

Exness
FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC
XM
CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC

Broker Maximum Leverage

Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.

Exness
1:2000
XM
1:1000

Open a Trading Account

Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.

EXPERT ANALYSIS

Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts

We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness logo

Exness

Raw Spread

XM logo

XM

Zero

Broker Alarab's Assessment

Raw Spread is a more specialized account than Standard or Pro. We see it as suitable for traders who understand how commissions and spreads affect total costs and whose strategies benefit from lower spreads. The correct comparison should be based on the complete transaction cost rather than the spread figure alone.

Broker Alarab's Assessment

We see XM Zero as particularly relevant to active and spread-sensitive traders rather than those simply looking for the easiest pricing model. Its 0.0–0.3 pip range is the tightest among the XM accounts in our data, but the $7-per-lot commission means the real comparison should be based on total cost versus Ultra Low and Standard.

Account Advantages

  • ✓Low spreads suitable for cost-sensitive strategies
  • ✓Suitable for active traders
  • ✓Can be practical for scalping strategies
  • ✓Clear pricing structure combining spreads and commissions
  • ✓Designed for more experienced traders

Account Advantages

  • ✓Displayed spread range of 0.0–0.3 pips based on Broker Alarab data
  • ✓Tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our dataset
  • ✓Can suit active and spread-sensitive traders
  • ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
  • ✓Separates part of the trading cost into a clearly stated per-lot commission

Disadvantages and Considerations

  • !Trading commissions must be considered alongside spreads
  • !More complex than commission-free accounts
  • !Not necessarily the lowest-cost option for every instrument or strategy
  • !May not be the most suitable choice for beginners

Disadvantages and Considerations

  • !Carries a $7-per-lot trading commission according to our account data
  • !Tighter spreads do not guarantee the lowest total cost on every trade
  • !Its pricing model requires traders to evaluate spread and commission together
  • !Ultra Low may be simpler for traders who prefer no separate commission

Who Is This Account Suitable For?

  • •Active traders
  • •Traders using scalping strategies
  • •Those who place a high priority on low spreads
  • •Traders comfortable calculating spreads and commissions together

Who Is This Account Suitable For?

  • •Traders who place a high priority on tight spreads
  • •Active traders comparing execution costs across a larger number of trades
  • •Users comfortable with part of their trading cost being charged as a defined per-lot commission
  • •Traders directly comparing XM’s tighter-spread Zero account with Ultra Low

Detailed Account Analysis

Raw Spread vs Standard

Raw Spread and Standard use different cost models. Standard relies on spreads without a direct trading commission, while Raw Spread aims to provide lower spreads while adding a trading commission. Standard can therefore be easier for traders who prefer simple pricing, whereas Raw Spread may become more attractive to frequent traders who genuinely benefit from lower spreads after including commission in the total transaction cost.

Raw Spread vs Pro

Pro offers a model without a direct commission and more competitive spreads than basic accounts, while Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost between the spread and commission. The choice depends on instruments, trading volume and frequency. Traders prioritizing simplicity may prefer Pro, while those highly sensitive to spread costs may favor Raw Spread after comparing the complete transaction cost under both pricing models.

Raw Spread vs Zero

Both accounts target traders focused on reducing spread-related costs, but their pricing and commissions vary by account and instrument. There is therefore no single answer that applies to every trader. A better comparison is to select the instruments normally traded and calculate both spread and commission under each account. This helps determine whether Raw Spread or Zero is more cost-efficient for the trader's actual strategy.

Detailed Account Analysis

XM Zero vs Ultra Low: Which Account Has Lower Trading Costs?

This is the key comparison when evaluating XM Zero. Broker Alarab data lists Zero spreads at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission, while Ultra Low is listed at 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate commission. Zero therefore has a clear advantage in displayed spread range, but that does not prove it is cheaper overall. Traders should add the Zero commission to the spread cost and compare the result with Ultra Low according to instrument, trade size and trading frequency.

XM Zero vs Standard: Is the Lower Spread Worth the Commission?

The two accounts use clearly different pricing models. Our data lists Standard at 1.0–1.5 pips with no separate trading commission, compared with 0.0–0.3 pips and a $7-per-lot commission for Zero. Looking at spread alone favors Zero, but a proper cost comparison must include commission. Standard provides simpler commission-free pricing, while Zero gives spread-sensitive traders a tighter displayed range in exchange for a separate and measurable trading charge.

Is the XM Zero Account Good for Scalping and Active Trading?

The tighter displayed spread range makes XM Zero worth evaluating for active traders and strategies that are particularly sensitive to entry and exit costs. Suitability cannot be determined from spread alone, however. As trading frequency and volume increase, the $7-per-lot commission becomes an increasingly important part of total cost. Active traders should therefore compare the effective cost of Zero with Ultra Low using their own position sizes and trading frequency.

Important details about the Exness Raw Spread account

Low spreads with a separate commission

Raw Spread separates more of the trading cost from the spread and charges it as a per-lot commission. For this reason, traders should compare the combined spread-and-commission cost rather than choosing the account based on spread alone.

Commission depends on the instrument

Exness states that Raw Spread commission can be up to USD 3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, with the exact amount depending on the instrument traded. Commission applies to both directions of the trade, so contract specifications should be checked.

Designed for more active trading

Exness positions Raw Spread for experienced traders, combining ultra-low spreads with market execution and no general limit on the number of open positions. This structure makes it relevant for scalping, active trading and spread-sensitive strategies.

Important details about the XM Zero account

Zero does not mean zero trading cost

The account name and tight spread range do not mean trading is free. Our data lists spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips together with a $7-per-lot commission, so both components need to be included when evaluating cost.

The lowest spread does not always mean the cheapest account

Zero has the tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our data, but Ultra Low has no separate trading commission. Total cost can therefore differ according to trade size, instrument and trading frequency.

Minimum deposit does not define suitable trading capital

Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Zero, but this is an account requirement rather than a recommended trading balance. Capital and position size should reflect strategy, leverage and acceptable risk.

DECISION GUIDE

How to Choose the Right Trading Account

Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.

01

Compare Spreads and Commissions Together

The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, while XM Zero shows 0.0 – 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.

02

Review Minimum Deposit Requirements

The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Raw Spread is $200, compared with $5 for XM Zero. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.

03

Compare Trading Platforms and Execution

Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.

04

Verify Regulation and Eligibility

Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FAQs About Exness Raw Spread vs XM Zero

Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.

What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and XM Zero?+
The recorded spread for Exness Raw Spread is 0.0 – 0.3, compared with 0.0 – 0.3 for XM Zero. The advertised commissions are Not specified and Not specified, respectively. You should also consider execution conditions, deposit requirements and account availability.
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Not necessarily. Trading costs should be evaluated using both spreads and commissions, while considering the financial instrument, position size and execution conditions.
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
Yes. Broker Alarab allows traders to compare accounts from the same broker or from different brokers.
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
Review the broker's official account specifications, applicable legal entity and trading conditions. Spreads, commissions and leverage may vary by instrument, account and jurisdiction.
What is the Exness Raw Spread account and who is it suitable for?+
Exness Raw Spread is a professional account focused on providing tight spreads in exchange for a separate trading commission. This pricing structure makes it particularly relevant to active traders, scalpers and spread-sensitive strategies, although the spread and commission should always be combined when evaluating the true cost of a trade.
How much is the commission on the Exness Raw Spread account?+
The Raw Spread commission depends on the instrument traded. Exness states that commission can be up to $3.50 per lot per side on most instruments, meaning traders should consider the cost of both opening and closing a position together with the spread. The exact commission can vary by instrument.
What is the difference between Exness Raw Spread and Zero?+
Both accounts target traders who value tight spreads and both use separate commission structures, but their pricing differs by account and instrument. Zero focuses on the availability of zero spreads on eligible instruments during specified periods, while Raw Spread focuses on consistently tight raw-style pricing. The more useful comparison is the total cost on the instruments a trader actually uses.
Is the Exness Raw Spread account good for scalping?+
Raw Spread can be suitable for scalping because tighter spreads can matter when a strategy executes many trades or targets relatively small price movements. Its suitability still depends on the total cost after commission, the instrument traded, position size, market conditions and the execution requirements of the strategy.
What is the XM Zero account?+
The XM Zero account uses a low-spread pricing model with a separate per-lot commission. According to Broker Alarab account data, XM Zero spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips, commission is $7 per lot, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution. This distinguishes Zero from Standard and Ultra Low, which have no separate trading commission in our data.
What is the XM Zero spread and commission?+
Broker Alarab data lists the XM Zero spread at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. This is the tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our dataset, but the commission needs to be included when comparing total trading cost with XM Ultra Low or Standard rather than judging the account by spread alone.

Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail

Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.