
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Standard Centvs FxPro Standard
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Standard
What Makes Exness Standard Cent Different from FxPro Standard?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Standard Cent
The Exness Standard Cent account is designed for traders who want real-market experience with smaller position values and finer control over trade exposure rather than moving directly into conventional account sizes. It retains a simple commission-free structure but differs from Standard in balance denomination, contract sizing and instrument availability, making it particularly relevant for beginners and lower-risk strategy testing.
FxPro Standard
The FxPro Standard account is the broker’s standard trading option and is categorized by Broker Alarab for general traders seeking a straightforward pricing structure. Spreads range from 1.2–1.5 pips, there is no separate trading commission, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. Standard becomes particularly relevant when compared with the tighter-spread, commission-based FxPro Raw+ account.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Standard Cent | FxPro Standard |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | FxPro |
| Account Name | Standard Cent | Standard |
| Account Type | cent | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.8 – 1.3 | 1.2 – 1.5 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0.3 | 1.2 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 1 | 1.3 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $10 | $100 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:400 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Standard Cent

FxPro
Standard
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Standard Cent can be useful for practical learning and testing strategies with smaller trading sizes. We see it as particularly suitable for new traders or those moving gradually from demo to live trading, although it may not be the preferred option for traders using larger position sizes.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FxPro Standard as better suited to traders who prioritize straightforward pricing and want an account without a separate per-lot commission. Its 1.2–1.5 pip spread range makes comparison with Raw+ increasingly important as trading activity rises. Since both accounts start at $100 in our data, effective trading cost and trading style matter more than the minimum deposit.
Account Advantages
- ✓Supports smaller trading sizes
- ✓Useful for testing strategies in a live account
- ✓Allows more gradual capital management
- ✓Suitable for beginners in the early stages
- ✓No direct trading commission
Account Advantages
- ✓No separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Straightforward cost structure based primarily on the spread
- ✓Minimum deposit is $100 in our data
- ✓Categorized for general traders rather than a highly specialized trading profile
- ✓Provides a direct alternative for traders who do not prefer the tight-spread commission model of Raw+
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Not primarily designed for large trading volumes
- !Available instruments may be more limited than on some other accounts
- !Does not use the same pricing model aimed at professional traders
- !Traders may eventually need to move to another account type
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.2–1.5 pip spread range is wider than Raw+ in our data
- !No separate commission does not mean the transaction has no cost
- !The effect of the spread can become more significant as trading frequency and volume increase
- !Spread-sensitive traders should compare Standard with Raw+ and the other account options
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners who want to start with smaller position sizes
- •Traders testing strategies with real funds
- •Those transitioning from a demo account
- •Traders focused on gradual risk management
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders seeking an FxPro account with straightforward pricing
- •Users who prefer not to pay a separate commission per lot
- •Traders whose account choice does not depend on obtaining the tightest possible spread
- •Users who prefer a primarily spread-based cost model rather than combining spread and commission
Detailed Account Analysis
Why Do Traders Use a Standard Cent Account?
The main advantage of Standard Cent is the ability to trade with smaller position sizes than conventional accounts, helping traders experience live market conditions while maintaining greater control over exposure. Beginners may use it after practicing on a demo account, and it can also help when testing a new strategy before increasing trade sizes. Its primary purpose is flexible capital management rather than professional-level pricing.
Standard Cent vs Standard
Standard Cent suits traders who prioritize smaller positions and a gradual approach, while Standard is generally more suitable once a trader is ready for conventional trading volumes. Both provide a straightforward cost structure without a direct trading commission, but they serve different purposes. Cent may be preferable while testing a trading approach or limiting exposure, whereas Standard is designed for a more conventional stage of live trading.
Is Standard Cent Good for Testing Strategies?
Standard Cent can be practical for strategy testing because it allows traders to use real funds with relatively small position sizes. This creates a different experience from demo trading by introducing actual market conditions and the psychological discipline associated with real money. However, a strategy should still be evaluated over a meaningful period, and results at small trade sizes should not automatically be assumed to remain identical at larger volumes.
Detailed Account Analysis
FxPro Standard vs Raw+: What Is the Difference?
According to Broker Alarab data, Standard uses 1.2–1.5 pip spreads without a separate commission, while Raw+ uses 0.0–0.3 pip spreads with a $7-per-lot commission. Both accounts have a $100 minimum deposit and use Market Execution. The choice therefore is not driven by the entry requirement but by how trading costs are structured. Standard places more of the cost within the spread, while Raw+ reduces the spread in exchange for commission, making expected trading volume important to the comparison.
Is the FxPro Standard Account Suitable for General Traders?
Broker Alarab categorizes Standard for general traders, and its structure can suit users who want pricing that is easier to understand without a separate per-lot commission. Traders primarily monitor the spread, which ranges from 1.2–1.5 pips in our data. Simpler pricing does not mean Standard will always be the lowest-cost account. As trading becomes more active or a strategy becomes increasingly spread-sensitive, comparing effective costs with Raw+ and the other account options becomes more important.
When Does the FxPro Standard Spread Become an Important Cost Factor?
As transaction frequency or total trading volume increases, spread differences can have a greater cumulative effect. Standard carries no separate commission in our data but uses a 1.2–1.5 pip range compared with 0.0–0.3 pips on Raw+. Active traders should therefore avoid choosing solely because Standard is commission-free. A more useful comparison estimates the spread cost on Standard against the combined spread and commission cost of the alternative account.
Important details about the Exness Standard Cent account
A cent lot is not a standard lot
The defining feature of Standard Cent is its use of cent lots. One cent lot represents USD 1,000 in nominal value, equal to 0.01 of a standard lot, allowing traders to work with smaller position sizes and more granular risk control.
Account balance is displayed in cents
Standard Cent displays the balance in cent currency rather than whole currency units; for example, a USD 5 deposit appears as 500 USC. Traders should therefore account for the balance unit and cent-lot structure when calculating position size and risk.
The instrument range differs from Standard
Standard Cent is not simply a smaller version of Standard. Its symbols use the -c suffix and focus on forex pairs, gold and silver, while BTCUSDc and ETHUSDc are available on MT5 subject to Exness conditions.
Important details about the FxPro Standard account
Standard has no separate commission in our data
Broker Alarab data lists a $0 commission for the account, but the 1.2–1.5 pip spread range remains the primary trading cost and should be included in calculations.
The listed minimum deposit is $100
Broker Alarab lists a $100 minimum deposit for Standard. This is an account requirement in our data rather than a recommendation for suitable trading capital.
Compare Standard with Raw+ using total cost
Commission-free Standard and tight-spread Raw+ use different pricing models. Spread and commission should therefore be compared using expected lot size and trading frequency.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Standard Cent is 0.8 – 1.3, while FxPro Standard shows 1.2 – 1.5. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Standard Cent is $10, compared with $100 for FxPro Standard. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Standard Cent vs FxPro Standard
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Standard Cent and FxPro Standard?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Standard Cent account and is it suitable for beginners?+
How much is 1 Cent Lot in the Exness Standard Cent account?+
What is the difference between Exness Standard Cent and Standard?+
Does Exness Standard Cent charge a commission and what are its trading costs?+
What is the FxPro Standard account?+
What is the FxPro Standard spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
