
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Standardvs IC Markets Standard
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Standard
What Makes Exness Standard Different from IC Markets Standard?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Standard
The Exness Standard account is the core all-purpose option in the Exness account range, combining commission-free trading, accessible entry requirements and broad market access. It is a practical starting point for traders seeking a straightforward account for everyday trading before considering professional alternatives built around tighter spreads or different pricing structures.
IC Markets Standard
The IC Markets Standard account is the broker’s straightforward pricing option for traders who prefer trading without a separate per-lot commission. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 0.8–1.0 pips, commission is $0, the minimum deposit is $200 and orders use Market Execution. We categorize it for beginners, while comparing Standard with IC Markets Raw accounts becomes increasingly important as trading activity grows.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Standard | IC Markets Standard |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | IC Markets |
| Account Name | Standard | Standard |
| Account Type | standard | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.8 – 1.3 | 0.8 - 1.0 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 1 | 0.9 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $10 | $200 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Standard

IC Markets
Standard
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We consider the Exness Standard account a practical option for traders who want a simple account without a separate trading commission. Before choosing it, active traders should compare its spreads with the Pro, Raw Spread and Zero accounts, particularly when executing a high number of trades.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see IC Markets Standard as better suited to traders who value simple commission-free pricing, particularly beginners who do not want to calculate spread and commission together. However, IC Markets offers several Raw alternatives, making comparison essential. Its 0.8–1.0 pip range can matter more as volume and trading frequency increase, so zero commission alone should not determine the choice.
Account Advantages
- ✓No direct trading commission on trades
- ✓Simple and easy-to-understand cost structure
- ✓Suitable for beginners and less active traders
- ✓Access to a broad range of trading instruments
- ✓A practical alternative to commission-based accounts
Account Advantages
- ✓No separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Spreads range from 0.8–1.0 pips in our data
- ✓Straightforward cost structure that is easier for beginners to understand
- ✓Minimum deposit is $200 according to our data
- ✓Provides a clear alternative for traders who do not want tight-spread pricing with a separate commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Spreads may be higher than on some professional Exness accounts
- !May not be the lowest-cost option for highly active traders
- !Trading costs depend largely on the spread
- !Professional traders may prefer a more specialized pricing structure
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Spread range is wider than the Raw accounts listed in our data
- !Commission-free does not mean the transaction has no cost
- !Spread cost can become more important for scalping and frequent trading
- !Active traders should compare Standard with Raw Spread and the professional Raw tiers before choosing
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners looking for a clear and straightforward trading account
- •Traders who prefer trading without a separate commission
- •Traders looking for a general-purpose account
- •Those who prefer a simple way to understand trading costs
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners looking for an IC Markets account with easy-to-understand pricing
- •Traders who prefer not to pay a separate commission per lot
- •Lower-frequency traders who are not focused exclusively on obtaining the tightest possible spread
- •Users who prefer a primarily spread-based cost model instead of combining spread and commission
Detailed Account Analysis
Standard vs Standard Cent: Which Is Better?
The main difference between Standard and Standard Cent is how traders can manage capital and position sizes. Standard is designed for conventional trading volumes, while Standard Cent allows smaller position sizing and can provide greater flexibility for beginners. Standard Cent may suit traders testing strategies or starting with limited exposure, while Standard is generally more appropriate for moving toward regular trading with larger position sizes.
Standard vs Pro: Which Account Fits Better?
Standard focuses on simplicity and commission-free trading, while Pro targets more experienced traders who place greater importance on competitive spreads. The choice depends more on trading activity and position size than on the account name itself. Standard may be sufficient for traders placing fewer trades, while Pro becomes more relevant when spread differences have a greater impact on overall trading costs.
Standard vs Raw Spread and Zero
Standard uses a straightforward pricing model without a separate trading commission, while Raw Spread and Zero use different pricing structures combining more competitive spreads with commissions that depend on the account and instrument. Traders should therefore compare total transaction costs rather than spreads alone. Active traders may focus more on overall execution costs, while less active traders may prefer the simplicity of the Standard account.
Detailed Account Analysis
IC Markets Standard vs Raw Spread: Which Account Is Better?
This is one of the most important comparisons when choosing an IC Markets account. According to Broker Alarab data, Standard uses a 0.8–1.0 pip spread range with no separate commission, while Raw Spread uses 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Both have a $200 minimum deposit in our data, so the entry requirement does not decide the comparison. Standard provides simpler pricing, while Raw Spread reduces the spread in exchange for commission. The better option depends on lot size, trading frequency and the total cost produced by each structure.
Is the IC Markets Standard Account Good for Beginners?
Broker Alarab categorizes Standard for beginners, and one reason this type of account can suit newer traders is the clarity of its cost structure. There is no separate per-lot commission, allowing traders to focus primarily on the spread when understanding entry and exit costs. This does not reduce trading risk or guarantee that Standard is always the cheapest account. Its main advantage for beginners is pricing simplicity, while Raw accounts can be compared later as trading size and frequency increase.
When Does a Raw Account Make More Sense Than Standard?
As traders become more spread-sensitive or increase their transaction frequency and trading volume, comparing Standard with the Raw accounts becomes more important. Standard is listed at 0.8–1.0 pips in our data, while several Raw options use tighter ranges with separate commissions. Traders should translate both the spread difference and commission into an effective cost at their expected lot size. This produces a more useful decision than relying only on labels such as commission-free or tight spread.
Important details about the Exness Standard account
No separate trading commission
The Exness Standard account does not charge a separate trading commission, so the cost of opening a trade is primarily reflected in the spread. This straightforward pricing structure can appeal to traders who prefer not to calculate an additional per-lot commission.
Broad access to multiple markets
Standard provides access to forex, metals, cryptocurrencies, energies, stocks and indices. This makes it a general-purpose Exness account rather than an account designed around only one asset class.
Trading volumes from 0.01 lot
The minimum trading volume on Standard starts from 0.01 lot where supported by the instrument. Orders use market execution, so the final execution price can differ from the displayed price when markets move quickly.
Important details about the IC Markets Standard account
Commission-free does not mean free trading
Standard has a $0 commission in our data, but its 0.8–1.0 pip spread range remains an important component of transaction cost and should be included in comparisons.
The minimum deposit in our data is $200
Broker Alarab lists a $200 minimum deposit for Standard. This is an account requirement rather than a recommendation for suitable trading capital or risk.
Compare Standard and Raw using total trading cost
The presence of commission on a Raw account or its absence on Standard does not determine the cheaper option by itself. Spread differences and commission should be compared using expected volume and transaction frequency.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Standard is 0.8 – 1.3, while IC Markets Standard shows 0.8 - 1.0. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Standard is $10, compared with $200 for IC Markets Standard. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Standard vs IC Markets Standard
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Standard and IC Markets Standard?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
Is the Exness Standard account suitable for beginners?+
What is the difference between Exness Standard and Standard Cent?+
Does the Exness Standard account charge a commission?+
What is the difference between Exness Standard and Pro?+
What is the IC Markets Standard account?+
What is the IC Markets Standard spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
