
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Zerovs FxPro Raw+
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Raw+
What Makes Exness Zero Different from FxPro Raw+?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Zero
The Exness Zero account is built for traders focused on accessing zero or extremely tight spreads on eligible instruments while accepting an instrument-based commission. The account should therefore be judged by the final transaction cost and the markets being traded rather than the Zero label alone, making it particularly relevant to active traders and highly spread-sensitive strategies.
FxPro Raw+
The FxPro Raw+ account is a tight-spread option within the FxPro account lineup and is categorized by Broker Alarab for beginners. Spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips, commission is $7 per lot, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. This makes Raw+ particularly relevant to traders researching FxPro Raw pricing or comparing Raw+ directly with the commission-free Standard account.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Zero | FxPro Raw+ |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | FxPro |
| Account Name | Zero | Raw+ |
| Account Type | raw | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 – 0.2 | 0.0 – 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $100 |
| Order Execution Method | Instant Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Classified as suitable for scalping |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:400 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Zero

FxPro
Raw+
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Zero can be a strong option for traders who prioritize low spreads on their main instruments, but it requires a clear understanding of commissions and total trading costs. We recommend comparing it directly with Raw Spread on the instruments actually traded rather than making a decision based on spreads alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FxPro Raw+ as a clear option for traders who place greater importance on tight spreads and accept a separate commission. Its 0.0–0.3 pip range differentiates it clearly from Standard, but the $7-per-lot commission should not be overlooked. Raw+ is best evaluated by calculating total cost and comparing it with Standard at the trader’s actual volume and frequency.
Account Advantages
- ✓Very low spreads on selected instruments
- ✓Suitable for spread-sensitive strategies
- ✓Can appeal to active traders
- ✓Provides a specialized alternative to commission-free accounts
- ✓Useful for traders comparing costs on specific instruments
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Significantly tighter spread range than the Standard account in our data
- ✓Minimum deposit is $100 in our database
- ✓Categorized for beginners within our FxPro account data
- ✓Provides a clear Raw pricing model for traders who prefer tighter spreads with a separate commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions vary by instrument
- !Total costs must be considered rather than spreads alone
- !May not be the best option for every instrument
- !The pricing structure requires more understanding than basic accounts
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a separate $7-per-lot commission
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean zero trading cost
- !Beginners need to understand how spread and commission combine when calculating costs
- !It cannot automatically be considered cheaper than Standard without considering trading volume and frequency
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using spread-sensitive strategies
- •Those focused on specific trading instruments
- •Traders comfortable comparing commissions and spreads together
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners who want to understand and use a tight-spread Raw pricing model
- •Traders who prioritize a tighter spread range
- •Users who prefer paying a separate commission in exchange for reducing the spread component
- •Traders comparing FxPro Raw+ with Standard using total trading cost
Detailed Account Analysis
Zero vs Standard
The difference between Zero and Standard starts with their pricing models. Standard provides a simpler experience without a direct trading commission, while Zero targets very low spreads on selected instruments and applies commissions that vary by instrument. Standard may therefore be clearer for general traders, while Zero becomes more relevant to active traders who closely monitor entry and exit costs and can evaluate spreads and commissions together.
Zero vs Pro
Pro and Zero offer two different approaches to achieving more competitive trading costs. Pro retains a model without a direct commission, while Zero uses commissions in exchange for more specialized spread conditions on selected instruments. The right choice depends on markets, trading frequency and position size. Traders should therefore compare actual costs on their main instruments rather than choosing an account based on either spreads or commissions in isolation.
Zero vs Raw Spread
Zero and Raw Spread are the closest options for traders who are highly sensitive to spread costs, but their commission and pricing structures vary by instrument. The better account cannot be determined from the account name alone. A more accurate approach is to compare the same instrument and position size under both accounts, then combine spread and commission costs. This is particularly useful for scalpers and highly active traders.
Detailed Account Analysis
FxPro Raw+ vs Standard: Which Account Fits Your Trading Style?
According to Broker Alarab data, Raw+ uses 0.0–0.3 pip spreads with a $7-per-lot commission, while Standard uses a 1.2–1.5 pip range without a separate commission. Both accounts start at $100 and use Market Execution. The comparison is therefore not simply between an expensive and inexpensive account but between two different pricing models. Traders should estimate spread and commission effects at their expected lot size and transaction frequency to determine which structure better fits their activity.
Does the FxPro Raw+ Spread Starting at 0.0 Mean Zero Trading Cost?
No. According to Broker Alarab data, the Raw+ spread range starts at 0.0 and extends to 0.3 pips, but the account carries a $7-per-lot commission. The minimum spread should therefore not be used alone as a measure of trading cost. Effective cost depends on the spread at execution together with commission linked to trade size. This distinction is particularly important when comparing Raw+ with Standard, which has no separate commission in our data.
Is the FxPro Raw+ Account Good for Beginners?
Broker Alarab categorizes Raw+ for beginners in our account data, but new traders need to understand the pricing model before choosing it. Unlike Standard, where cost is placed primarily within the spread, Raw+ separates pricing into a tighter spread and a separate commission. The structure is straightforward once understood, but it requires traders to evaluate complete transaction cost rather than focusing on spread alone. Beginners can therefore compare the accounts using expected transaction frequency and lot size.
Important details about the Exness Zero account
Zero spread does not mean zero trading cost
The defining feature of Zero is the availability of zero spreads on selected instruments during specified portions of the trading day, but the account charges an instrument-based commission. Total cost should therefore include both commission and the actual spread.
Zero-spread availability varies by instrument and time
According to Exness, zero spreads are available on more than 30 popular instruments for 95% of the trading day and on other available instruments for 50% of the day, subject to market volatility. The Zero name therefore does not mean every instrument remains at zero spread continuously.
Relevant for active and automated strategies
Zero uses market execution, and Exness states that it is suitable for Expert Advisors with no general limit on the number of open orders. This can make it relevant to active traders when their preferred instruments benefit from the account pricing structure.
Important details about the FxPro Raw+ account
Raw+ commission is listed at $7 per lot in our data
Broker Alarab data lists a $7-per-lot commission for Raw+. Commission should therefore be combined with the spread effect when calculating total trading cost.
The 0.0–0.3 pip range is not the complete cost
The ability for spreads to reach 0.0 does not mean a transaction is cost-free because the separate commission remains part of the account pricing model.
Raw+ and Standard both start at $100 in our data
Since the minimum deposit is the same for both accounts, comparison should focus more heavily on spread, commission, trading volume and transaction frequency.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Zero is 0.0 – 0.2, while FxPro Raw+ shows 0.0 – 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Zero is $200, compared with $100 for FxPro Raw+. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Zero vs FxPro Raw+
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Zero and FxPro Raw+?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Zero account and is the spread always zero?+
How much is the commission on the Exness Zero account?+
What is the difference between Exness Zero and Raw Spread?+
Is the Exness Zero account suitable for scalping and active trading?+
What is the FxPro Raw+ account?+
What is the FxPro Raw+ spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
