
Trading Account Comparison: Exness Zerovs FxPro Standard
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Standard
What Makes Exness Zero Different from FxPro Standard?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Exness Zero
The Exness Zero account is built for traders focused on accessing zero or extremely tight spreads on eligible instruments while accepting an instrument-based commission. The account should therefore be judged by the final transaction cost and the markets being traded rather than the Zero label alone, making it particularly relevant to active traders and highly spread-sensitive strategies.
FxPro Standard
The FxPro Standard account is the broker’s standard trading option and is categorized by Broker Alarab for general traders seeking a straightforward pricing structure. Spreads range from 1.2–1.5 pips, there is no separate trading commission, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. Standard becomes particularly relevant when compared with the tighter-spread, commission-based FxPro Raw+ account.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Exness Zero | FxPro Standard |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Exness | FxPro |
| Account Name | Zero | Standard |
| Account Type | raw | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 – 0.2 | 1.2 – 1.5 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 1.2 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 1.3 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $100 |
| Order Execution Method | Instant Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | FSCA | JSC | FCA | CySEC | SCB | FSCA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:400 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Exness
Zero

FxPro
Standard
Broker Alarab's Assessment
Zero can be a strong option for traders who prioritize low spreads on their main instruments, but it requires a clear understanding of commissions and total trading costs. We recommend comparing it directly with Raw Spread on the instruments actually traded rather than making a decision based on spreads alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FxPro Standard as better suited to traders who prioritize straightforward pricing and want an account without a separate per-lot commission. Its 1.2–1.5 pip spread range makes comparison with Raw+ increasingly important as trading activity rises. Since both accounts start at $100 in our data, effective trading cost and trading style matter more than the minimum deposit.
Account Advantages
- ✓Very low spreads on selected instruments
- ✓Suitable for spread-sensitive strategies
- ✓Can appeal to active traders
- ✓Provides a specialized alternative to commission-free accounts
- ✓Useful for traders comparing costs on specific instruments
Account Advantages
- ✓No separate trading commission according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Straightforward cost structure based primarily on the spread
- ✓Minimum deposit is $100 in our data
- ✓Categorized for general traders rather than a highly specialized trading profile
- ✓Provides a direct alternative for traders who do not prefer the tight-spread commission model of Raw+
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Trading commissions vary by instrument
- !Total costs must be considered rather than spreads alone
- !May not be the best option for every instrument
- !The pricing structure requires more understanding than basic accounts
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.2–1.5 pip spread range is wider than Raw+ in our data
- !No separate commission does not mean the transaction has no cost
- !The effect of the spread can become more significant as trading frequency and volume increase
- !Spread-sensitive traders should compare Standard with Raw+ and the other account options
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders
- •Traders using spread-sensitive strategies
- •Those focused on specific trading instruments
- •Traders comfortable comparing commissions and spreads together
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders seeking an FxPro account with straightforward pricing
- •Users who prefer not to pay a separate commission per lot
- •Traders whose account choice does not depend on obtaining the tightest possible spread
- •Users who prefer a primarily spread-based cost model rather than combining spread and commission
Detailed Account Analysis
Zero vs Standard
The difference between Zero and Standard starts with their pricing models. Standard provides a simpler experience without a direct trading commission, while Zero targets very low spreads on selected instruments and applies commissions that vary by instrument. Standard may therefore be clearer for general traders, while Zero becomes more relevant to active traders who closely monitor entry and exit costs and can evaluate spreads and commissions together.
Zero vs Pro
Pro and Zero offer two different approaches to achieving more competitive trading costs. Pro retains a model without a direct commission, while Zero uses commissions in exchange for more specialized spread conditions on selected instruments. The right choice depends on markets, trading frequency and position size. Traders should therefore compare actual costs on their main instruments rather than choosing an account based on either spreads or commissions in isolation.
Zero vs Raw Spread
Zero and Raw Spread are the closest options for traders who are highly sensitive to spread costs, but their commission and pricing structures vary by instrument. The better account cannot be determined from the account name alone. A more accurate approach is to compare the same instrument and position size under both accounts, then combine spread and commission costs. This is particularly useful for scalpers and highly active traders.
Detailed Account Analysis
FxPro Standard vs Raw+: What Is the Difference?
According to Broker Alarab data, Standard uses 1.2–1.5 pip spreads without a separate commission, while Raw+ uses 0.0–0.3 pip spreads with a $7-per-lot commission. Both accounts have a $100 minimum deposit and use Market Execution. The choice therefore is not driven by the entry requirement but by how trading costs are structured. Standard places more of the cost within the spread, while Raw+ reduces the spread in exchange for commission, making expected trading volume important to the comparison.
Is the FxPro Standard Account Suitable for General Traders?
Broker Alarab categorizes Standard for general traders, and its structure can suit users who want pricing that is easier to understand without a separate per-lot commission. Traders primarily monitor the spread, which ranges from 1.2–1.5 pips in our data. Simpler pricing does not mean Standard will always be the lowest-cost account. As trading becomes more active or a strategy becomes increasingly spread-sensitive, comparing effective costs with Raw+ and the other account options becomes more important.
When Does the FxPro Standard Spread Become an Important Cost Factor?
As transaction frequency or total trading volume increases, spread differences can have a greater cumulative effect. Standard carries no separate commission in our data but uses a 1.2–1.5 pip range compared with 0.0–0.3 pips on Raw+. Active traders should therefore avoid choosing solely because Standard is commission-free. A more useful comparison estimates the spread cost on Standard against the combined spread and commission cost of the alternative account.
Important details about the Exness Zero account
Zero spread does not mean zero trading cost
The defining feature of Zero is the availability of zero spreads on selected instruments during specified portions of the trading day, but the account charges an instrument-based commission. Total cost should therefore include both commission and the actual spread.
Zero-spread availability varies by instrument and time
According to Exness, zero spreads are available on more than 30 popular instruments for 95% of the trading day and on other available instruments for 50% of the day, subject to market volatility. The Zero name therefore does not mean every instrument remains at zero spread continuously.
Relevant for active and automated strategies
Zero uses market execution, and Exness states that it is suitable for Expert Advisors with no general limit on the number of open orders. This can make it relevant to active traders when their preferred instruments benefit from the account pricing structure.
Important details about the FxPro Standard account
Standard has no separate commission in our data
Broker Alarab data lists a $0 commission for the account, but the 1.2–1.5 pip spread range remains the primary trading cost and should be included in calculations.
The listed minimum deposit is $100
Broker Alarab lists a $100 minimum deposit for Standard. This is an account requirement in our data rather than a recommendation for suitable trading capital.
Compare Standard with Raw+ using total cost
Commission-free Standard and tight-spread Raw+ use different pricing models. Spread and commission should therefore be compared using expected lot size and trading frequency.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Exness Zero is 0.0 – 0.2, while FxPro Standard shows 1.2 – 1.5. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Exness Zero is $200, compared with $100 for FxPro Standard. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Exness Zero vs FxPro Standard
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Exness Zero and FxPro Standard?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Exness Zero account and is the spread always zero?+
How much is the commission on the Exness Zero account?+
What is the difference between Exness Zero and Raw Spread?+
Is the Exness Zero account suitable for scalping and active trading?+
What is the FxPro Standard account?+
What is the FxPro Standard spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
