
Trading Account Comparison: IC Markets Raw Pro+vs XM Zero
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Zero
What Makes IC Markets Raw Pro+ Different from XM Zero?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
IC Markets Raw Pro+
The IC Markets Raw Pro+ account is a tight-spread option categorized in Broker Alarab data for high-volume traders. It combines 0.0–0.1 pip spreads with a $1-per-lot commission, a $200 minimum deposit and Market Execution. This pricing structure makes Raw Pro+ particularly relevant to traders comparing it with Raw Pro and Raw Spread as trading volume increases.
XM Zero
The XM Zero account targets traders who prioritize tight spreads and are comfortable with a separate commission-based pricing model. Based on Broker Alarab account data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips, commission is $7 per lot, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution, making Zero distinctly different from XM Standard and Ultra Low.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | IC Markets Raw Pro+ | XM Zero |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | IC Markets | XM |
| Account Name | Raw Pro+ | Zero |
| Account Type | raw | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 - 0.1 | 0.0 – 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.05 | 0.2 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

IC Markets
Raw Pro+

XM
Zero
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see IC Markets Raw Pro+ as particularly relevant to high-volume traders because our data combines a 0.0–0.1 pip spread range with a $1-per-lot commission. Its significance is not simply the Raw label but the lower commission compared with Raw Pro and Raw Spread. As total traded lots increase, calculating cumulative cost differences becomes increasingly important.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see XM Zero as particularly relevant to active and spread-sensitive traders rather than those simply looking for the easiest pricing model. Its 0.0–0.3 pip range is the tightest among the XM accounts in our data, but the $7-per-lot commission means the real comparison should be based on total cost versus Ultra Low and Standard.
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.0–0.1 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Commission is $1 per lot according to our data
- ✓Lowest listed commission among the five IC Markets accounts in our table
- ✓Categorized for high-volume traders
- ✓Combines a tight spread range with lower commission than Raw Pro and Raw Spread
Account Advantages
- ✓Displayed spread range of 0.0–0.3 pips based on Broker Alarab data
- ✓Tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our dataset
- ✓Can suit active and spread-sensitive traders
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Separates part of the trading cost into a clearly stated per-lot commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a separate per-lot commission despite being lower than the other Raw accounts
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean zero trading cost
- !The benefit of lower commission becomes more meaningful as trading volume increases and may not matter equally to every user
- !Traders should compare actual costs with Raw Pro and Raw Spread rather than relying on the Pro+ label
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a $7-per-lot trading commission according to our account data
- !Tighter spreads do not guarantee the lowest total cost on every trade
- !Its pricing model requires traders to evaluate spread and commission together
- !Ultra Low may be simpler for traders who prefer no separate commission
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •High-volume traders for whom cumulative commission becomes an important cost factor
- •Active traders seeking a very tight listed spread range
- •Traders comparing Raw Pro+ and Raw Pro on a per-lot cost basis
- •Users who prefer tight-spread pricing with a separate commission instead of the Standard model
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders who place a high priority on tight spreads
- •Active traders comparing execution costs across a larger number of trades
- •Users comfortable with part of their trading cost being charged as a defined per-lot commission
- •Traders directly comparing XM’s tighter-spread Zero account with Ultra Low
Detailed Account Analysis
IC Markets Raw Pro+ vs Raw Pro: What Is the Real Difference?
According to Broker Alarab data, both accounts share a 0.0–0.1 pip spread range, a $200 minimum deposit and Market Execution. The clear difference in our table is commission: Raw Pro+ is listed at $1 per lot compared with $1.5 per lot on Raw Pro. That difference may appear modest on a small trade but becomes increasingly meaningful as total traded lots rise. The comparison should therefore focus on volume and cumulative cost rather than spread alone.
Is IC Markets Raw Pro+ Suitable for High-Volume Trading?
Broker Alarab categorizes the account for high-volume traders, making its $1-per-lot commission particularly relevant to this use case. When a trader executes a large number of lots, commission repeats with the volume traded and relatively small per-lot differences can accumulate. Our data also lists a 0.0–0.1 pip spread range. The useful approach is to calculate total costs at expected volume rather than assuming that the lowest commission automatically makes it the best account for every trader.
Raw Pro+ vs Raw Spread: How Do the Costs Differ?
The difference in our data goes beyond the account names. Raw Pro+ uses 0.0–0.1 pip spreads with a $1-per-lot commission, while Raw Spread uses 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Both carry a $200 minimum deposit in our table. Raw Pro+ therefore becomes particularly interesting at higher trading volumes, but the final comparison should still be based on effective trading cost and trading style rather than isolated figures.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Zero vs Ultra Low: Which Account Has Lower Trading Costs?
This is the key comparison when evaluating XM Zero. Broker Alarab data lists Zero spreads at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission, while Ultra Low is listed at 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate commission. Zero therefore has a clear advantage in displayed spread range, but that does not prove it is cheaper overall. Traders should add the Zero commission to the spread cost and compare the result with Ultra Low according to instrument, trade size and trading frequency.
XM Zero vs Standard: Is the Lower Spread Worth the Commission?
The two accounts use clearly different pricing models. Our data lists Standard at 1.0–1.5 pips with no separate trading commission, compared with 0.0–0.3 pips and a $7-per-lot commission for Zero. Looking at spread alone favors Zero, but a proper cost comparison must include commission. Standard provides simpler commission-free pricing, while Zero gives spread-sensitive traders a tighter displayed range in exchange for a separate and measurable trading charge.
Is the XM Zero Account Good for Scalping and Active Trading?
The tighter displayed spread range makes XM Zero worth evaluating for active traders and strategies that are particularly sensitive to entry and exit costs. Suitability cannot be determined from spread alone, however. As trading frequency and volume increase, the $7-per-lot commission becomes an increasingly important part of total cost. Active traders should therefore compare the effective cost of Zero with Ultra Low using their own position sizes and trading frequency.
Important details about the IC Markets Raw Pro+ account
Raw Pro+ commission is listed at $1 per lot in our data
This page uses current Broker Alarab account data, which lists a $1-per-lot commission. Commission should be combined with the spread effect when calculating effective trading cost.
The 0.0–0.1 pip range is not the complete cost
Even with a tight spread range, the account carries a separate per-lot commission. A spread that can reach 0.0 should therefore not be interpreted as cost-free trading.
Trading volume is central to evaluating Raw Pro+
We categorize the account for high-volume traders. As total traded lots increase, differences between Raw Pro+ commission and the commissions on other Raw accounts become more meaningful.
Important details about the XM Zero account
Zero does not mean zero trading cost
The account name and tight spread range do not mean trading is free. Our data lists spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips together with a $7-per-lot commission, so both components need to be included when evaluating cost.
The lowest spread does not always mean the cheapest account
Zero has the tightest displayed spread range among the XM accounts in our data, but Ultra Low has no separate trading commission. Total cost can therefore differ according to trade size, instrument and trading frequency.
Minimum deposit does not define suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Zero, but this is an account requirement rather than a recommended trading balance. Capital and position size should reflect strategy, leverage and acceptable risk.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for IC Markets Raw Pro+ is 0.0 - 0.1, while XM Zero shows 0.0 – 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for IC Markets Raw Pro+ is $200, compared with $5 for XM Zero. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About IC Markets Raw Pro+ vs XM Zero
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between IC Markets Raw Pro+ and XM Zero?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro+ account?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro+ spread and commission?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro+ minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between IC Markets Raw Pro+ and Raw Pro?+
What is the XM Zero account?+
What is the XM Zero spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
