FBS vs Ultima Markets: Which Broker Is Better?

FBS operates through entities that include Tradestone Ltd, authorised by CySEC under licence number 331/17; FBS Trading (Seychelles) Ltd, regulated by the Seychelles FSA under licence number SD066; and FBS Markets Inc, supervised by the financial regulator in Belize. The entity available to each client depends on the country of residence and the website used during registration.

The CySEC entity represents the strongest regulatory framework within the group for eligible clients, while international services are often provided through Seychelles or Belize entities. These entities may offer more flexible leverage or promotions, but investor protection, complaint procedures and compensation arrangements may not match those available under the European entity.

Before opening an FBS account or relying on promotional offers, traders should verify the legal company name and licence number in the client agreement. This is particularly important for beginners, who should not confuse easy funding or attractive promotions with the regulatory protection that actually applies to their account and funds.

FBS states that client funds are held separately from company operating funds and that negative balance protection is available under the conditions of the relevant account and legal entity. The broker also uses Margin Call and Stop Out levels to manage margin exposure when an account’s available equity falls during market movements.

Margin Call and Stop Out mechanisms do not guarantee client funds or prevent trading losses. Fund protection, complaint procedures and regulatory safeguards may differ between Tradestone Ltd under CySEC and the international entities in Seychelles or Belize. Traders should review the legal company, withdrawal policy and account conditions before depositing.

Ultima Markets appears in the available regulatory data through Ultima Markets ZA (Pty) Ltd, registered with the FSCA in South Africa under number 52497, and Ultima Markets Ltd, supervised by the financial regulator in Mauritius under number GB23201593. This structure is less diverse than that of brokers with entities authorised by the FCA, ASIC or CySEC.

Two regulated entities provide a legal framework for delivering services, but they do not automatically offer the same protection as brokers supervised by leading regulators. Leverage, account conditions, complaint procedures and legal protection may vary according to the entity assigned to the client during registration.

Before opening an Ultima Markets account, traders should verify the legal company name, licence number and permitted activities in the official register. This is particularly important for traders attracted by flexible accounts or promotional conditions, as it helps assess regulatory strength independently from the broker’s trading offer.

Ultima Markets states that client funds are separated from the company’s operating money under the requirements of the entity responsible for the account. Negative balance protection may also apply according to the relevant trading conditions, helping eligible clients limit liability arising from a negative account balance.

The current regulatory structure in our data includes entities supervised by FSCA in South Africa and FSC in Mauritius, without an FCA, ASIC or CySEC-regulated entity. Traders should carefully review the client agreement, withdrawal policy, complaint process and protection limits before depositing or maintaining a large balance with Ultima Markets.