
Trading Account Comparison: Equiti Classicvs FP Markets Raw
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Raw
What Makes Equiti Classic Different from FP Markets Raw?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Equiti Classic
The Equiti Classic account is an entry-focused account for traders who want straightforward pricing without a high funding requirement. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 1.4–1.8 pips, with no separate trading commission, no minimum deposit and Market Execution, making it worth considering for beginners and traders who prefer a primarily spread-based cost structure.
FP Markets Raw
The FP Markets Raw account is the broker’s low-spread option and is categorized by Broker Alarab for scalpers and active traders. According to our data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips with a recorded average of 0.1 pip, commission is $6 per lot, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. Raw differs from Standard primarily in how trading costs are divided between spreads and commission.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Equiti Classic | FP Markets Raw |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Equiti | FP Markets |
| Account Name | Classic | Raw |
| Account Type | standard | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 1.4 – 1.8 | 0.0 - 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 1.4 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Classified as suitable for scalping |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Equiti
Classic

FP Markets
Raw
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see the Equiti Classic account as better suited to traders prioritizing easy entry, no separate commission and no minimum deposit. Its 1.4–1.8 pip spread range is not the tightest among Equiti accounts in our data, making comparison with Standard important for tighter spreads and Premier relevant when total trading cost becomes a greater priority.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FP Markets Raw as particularly relevant to traders prioritizing tight spreads, with its listed 0.0–0.3 pip range and 0.1-pip recorded average. However, the $6 per-lot commission is an essential cost component and should not be ignored. Evaluating Raw, especially against Standard, should therefore focus on expected total cost and trading volume rather than the spread figure alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓No minimum deposit according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓No separate trading commission on the account
- ✓Straightforward cost structure that is easier for newer traders to understand
- ✓Can provide an accessible starting point without a fixed deposit requirement
- ✓Offers a simple entry option before moving to more specialized Equiti pricing models
Account Advantages
- ✓Listed spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Recorded average spread is 0.1 pip
- ✓Tighter listed spread range than the Standard account
- ✓Categorized for scalpers and active traders
- ✓The $100 minimum deposit is the same as Standard
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.4–1.8 pip spread range is not the tightest among Equiti accounts in our data
- !Standard provides a tighter displayed spread range with a relatively low deposit requirement
- !Spread cost can become more significant as trading size or frequency increases
- !Active traders should compare Classic with Premier rather than focusing only on the absence of commission
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !A $6 per-lot trading commission applies according to our data
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean trading cost is zero
- !Higher total trading volume increases the cumulative impact of commission
- !Traders should compare both spread and commission with Standard rather than relying on the minimum spread alone
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners looking for a straightforward Equiti account to start with
- •Traders who prefer an account without a separate per-lot commission
- •Users who do not want to commit to a stated minimum deposit
- •Traders who value account simplicity more than obtaining the tightest available spread
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Scalpers according to Broker Alarab account categorization
- •Active traders who prioritize tight spreads
- •Users who prefer a pricing model that separates commission from the spread
- •Traders comparing Raw with Standard who can evaluate total cost based on their trading volume
Detailed Account Analysis
Equiti Classic vs Standard: Which Account Is Better for Starting Out?
Comparing Classic and Standard is important because both use a no-separate-commission model in Broker Alarab data. Classic has spreads of 1.4–1.8 pips and no minimum deposit, while Standard has a tighter 1.2–1.6 pip range with a $30 minimum deposit. Classic therefore provides greater flexibility around initial funding, while Standard offers a clear displayed spread advantage for a relatively low entry requirement. The better choice depends on whether easier access or tighter spreads matter more to the trader.
Does Zero Commission Make the Equiti Classic Account Low Cost?
Having no separate commission makes Classic pricing easier to understand, but it does not mean trading is cost-free. The 1.4–1.8 pip spread range remains an important component of entry and exit costs, and its impact can increase with larger positions or more frequent trading. Traders should therefore compare effective costs rather than focusing on the phrase zero commission alone, especially when evaluating Classic against the tighter-spread Standard account or the spread-plus-commission structure of Premier.
Equiti Classic vs Premier: Simpler Pricing or Tighter Spreads?
The two accounts use clearly different pricing structures. Classic is listed at 1.4–1.8 pips with no separate commission and no minimum deposit in our data. Premier, by comparison, has a 0.0–0.3 pip spread range, a $7-per-lot commission and a $100 minimum deposit. Classic provides a simpler entry and pricing structure, while Premier targets traders who place greater importance on tight spreads. Determining which is cheaper requires comparing spread, commission and actual trading volume together.
Detailed Account Analysis
Does the FP Markets Raw Spread Start From 0.0 Pips?
Yes. The recorded minimum spread for FP Markets Raw is 0.0 pips, while the full listed range is 0.0–0.3 pips and the recorded average is 0.1 pip according to Broker Alarab data. The 0.0 figure does not mean trading is cost-free, however, because the account carries a $6 per-lot commission. Spread figures should therefore be read together with commission when evaluating costs.
FP Markets Raw vs Standard: Tighter Spreads or No Commission?
Raw and Standard use different pricing models. Raw has listed spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips with a $6 per-lot commission, while Standard has 1.0–1.5 pip spreads without a separate commission. Both accounts have a $100 minimum deposit. The comparison therefore centers on whether tighter spreads plus commission are more suitable for the trader’s expected volume and frequency than wider spreads without a separate commission.
Why Does Trading Volume Matter for FP Markets Raw Commission?
The recorded Raw commission is $6 per lot, making total traded lots an important factor when estimating costs. As cumulative trading volume increases, the commission component has a larger impact on total transaction costs. This is particularly relevant because the account is categorized for scalpers and active traders, trading styles that may involve greater transaction frequency than less active approaches.
Important details about the Equiti Classic account
Zero commission does not mean zero trading cost
Classic has no separate trading commission in our data, but its 1.4–1.8 pip spread remains part of transaction cost. Traders should therefore evaluate the spread alongside any other costs relevant to their trading approach.
No minimum deposit is not recommended trading capital
Broker Alarab data lists no minimum deposit for Classic, but that does not mean every balance is suitable for live trading. Capital should reflect position size, leverage, strategy and individual risk limits.
Classic is not the tightest-spread Equiti account
Standard and Premier have tighter displayed spread ranges in our data. Classic therefore stands out more for accessibility and pricing simplicity than for competing for the lowest spread within the Equiti account lineup.
Important details about the FP Markets Raw account
Commission is $6 per lot
This commission is a core component of the Raw pricing model according to Broker Alarab data and should be evaluated alongside the spread when comparing Raw with Standard.
0.0 pips is the start of the spread range, not zero cost
The listed spread ranges from 0.0–0.3 pips with a 0.1-pip recorded average, but the separate commission means trading cost is not zero even when the spread reaches 0.0.
The minimum deposit is $100
Raw and Standard have the same recorded $100 minimum deposit. This figure represents an account requirement rather than a recommendation for appropriate trading capital.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Equiti Classic is 1.4 – 1.8, while FP Markets Raw shows 0.0 - 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Equiti Classic is $0, compared with $100 for FP Markets Raw. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Equiti Classic vs FP Markets Raw
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Equiti Classic and FP Markets Raw?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Equiti Classic account?+
What is the Equiti Classic spread and commission?+
What is the Equiti Classic minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between Equiti Classic, Standard and Premier?+
What is the FP Markets Raw account?+
What is the FP Markets Raw spread?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
