
Trading Account Comparison: Equiti Microvs FP Markets Raw
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Raw
What Makes Equiti Micro Different from FP Markets Raw?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Equiti Micro
The Equiti Micro account provides a straightforward option for traders who prioritize accessibility over obtaining the tightest spreads. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips, with no separate trading commission, no minimum deposit and Market Execution. It should therefore be evaluated around its accessible structure while recognizing its wider spreads compared with other Equiti accounts.
FP Markets Raw
The FP Markets Raw account is the broker’s low-spread option and is categorized by Broker Alarab for scalpers and active traders. According to our data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips with a recorded average of 0.1 pip, commission is $6 per lot, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. Raw differs from Standard primarily in how trading costs are divided between spreads and commission.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Equiti Micro | FP Markets Raw |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Equiti | FP Markets |
| Account Name | Micro | Raw |
| Account Type | cent | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 1.8 – 2.5 | 0.0 - 0.3 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 1.8 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 2.1 | 0.1 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Classified as suitable for scalping |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Equiti
Micro

FP Markets
Raw
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Equiti Micro as an account that requires a more deliberate choice: it offers no minimum deposit and no separate commission, but its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest in our Equiti data. It should therefore be compared directly with Classic, which provides the same commission and deposit advantages with a tighter displayed spread range.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FP Markets Raw as particularly relevant to traders prioritizing tight spreads, with its listed 0.0–0.3 pip range and 0.1-pip recorded average. However, the $6 per-lot commission is an essential cost component and should not be ignored. Evaluating Raw, especially against Standard, should therefore focus on expected total cost and trading volume rather than the spread figure alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓No minimum deposit according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓No separate trading commission on the account
- ✓Straightforward pricing structure based primarily on spread
- ✓Does not require committing to a stated initial deposit amount
- ✓Provides an additional option when comparing Equiti account types before opening an account
Account Advantages
- ✓Listed spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Recorded average spread is 0.1 pip
- ✓Tighter listed spread range than the Standard account
- ✓Categorized for scalpers and active traders
- ✓The $100 minimum deposit is the same as Standard
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among Equiti accounts in our data
- !Classic combines the same zero commission and no minimum deposit with a tighter spread range
- !Standard provides clearly tighter spreads in exchange for a $30 minimum deposit
- !Spread costs can become increasingly important as trading volume or frequency rises
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !A $6 per-lot trading commission applies according to our data
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean trading cost is zero
- !Higher total trading volume increases the cumulative impact of commission
- !Traders should compare both spread and commission with Standard rather than relying on the minimum spread alone
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders looking for an Equiti account with no minimum deposit
- •Users who prefer not to pay a separate per-lot commission
- •Traders comparing Micro with Classic before choosing an Equiti account
- •Users who prioritize a straightforward account structure over obtaining the tightest spreads
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Scalpers according to Broker Alarab account categorization
- •Active traders who prioritize tight spreads
- •Users who prefer a pricing model that separates commission from the spread
- •Traders comparing Raw with Standard who can evaluate total cost based on their trading volume
Detailed Account Analysis
Equiti Micro vs Classic: What Is the Real Difference?
This is the key comparison for Micro because neither account has a separate trading commission or minimum deposit in Broker Alarab data. The clearest difference is spread: Micro is listed at 1.8–2.5 pips, while Classic ranges from 1.4–1.8 pips. Classic therefore has a clear advantage in the displayed spread range. Traders specifically considering Micro should focus on whether the account type suits their needs, because zero commission and no minimum deposit do not give Micro a pricing advantage over Classic based on our figures.
Is the Equiti Micro Account Low Cost Because It Has Zero Commission?
No. The separate commission listed for Micro is $0, but that does not remove spread cost. Its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among the Equiti accounts in our dataset, making spread an important component of total cost, particularly as trading frequency or volume increases. Cost-conscious traders should compare Micro with Classic and Standard rather than using zero commission as the only deciding factor, because both alternatives have tighter displayed spread ranges.
Equiti Micro vs Standard: Is the $30 Minimum Deposit Worth Paying?
Micro has no minimum deposit and offers 1.8–2.5 pip spreads with no separate commission. Standard introduces a $30 minimum deposit but narrows the displayed spread range to 1.2–1.6 pips while keeping commission at $0 according to our data. Traders able to meet the $30 requirement therefore have a clear reason to compare the two accounts from a spread-cost perspective. The trade-off is not commission, but entry requirement versus the displayed pricing range.
Detailed Account Analysis
Does the FP Markets Raw Spread Start From 0.0 Pips?
Yes. The recorded minimum spread for FP Markets Raw is 0.0 pips, while the full listed range is 0.0–0.3 pips and the recorded average is 0.1 pip according to Broker Alarab data. The 0.0 figure does not mean trading is cost-free, however, because the account carries a $6 per-lot commission. Spread figures should therefore be read together with commission when evaluating costs.
FP Markets Raw vs Standard: Tighter Spreads or No Commission?
Raw and Standard use different pricing models. Raw has listed spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips with a $6 per-lot commission, while Standard has 1.0–1.5 pip spreads without a separate commission. Both accounts have a $100 minimum deposit. The comparison therefore centers on whether tighter spreads plus commission are more suitable for the trader’s expected volume and frequency than wider spreads without a separate commission.
Why Does Trading Volume Matter for FP Markets Raw Commission?
The recorded Raw commission is $6 per lot, making total traded lots an important factor when estimating costs. As cumulative trading volume increases, the commission component has a larger impact on total transaction costs. This is particularly relevant because the account is categorized for scalpers and active traders, trading styles that may involve greater transaction frequency than less active approaches.
Important details about the Equiti Micro account
Zero commission does not mean zero trading cost
Micro has no separate commission in our data, but spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips. Spread therefore remains an important component when evaluating the cost of opening and closing positions.
No minimum deposit does not determine suitable trading capital
Broker Alarab data lists no minimum deposit for Micro. This improves accessibility, but it does not mean every balance is appropriate for a particular strategy, position size or level of risk.
Compare Micro with Classic before choosing
Both accounts have no separate commission and no minimum deposit in our data, but Classic has a tighter displayed spread range. This makes the Micro versus Classic comparison particularly important before selecting the account.
Important details about the FP Markets Raw account
Commission is $6 per lot
This commission is a core component of the Raw pricing model according to Broker Alarab data and should be evaluated alongside the spread when comparing Raw with Standard.
0.0 pips is the start of the spread range, not zero cost
The listed spread ranges from 0.0–0.3 pips with a 0.1-pip recorded average, but the separate commission means trading cost is not zero even when the spread reaches 0.0.
The minimum deposit is $100
Raw and Standard have the same recorded $100 minimum deposit. This figure represents an account requirement rather than a recommendation for appropriate trading capital.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Equiti Micro is 1.8 – 2.5, while FP Markets Raw shows 0.0 - 0.3. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Equiti Micro is $0, compared with $100 for FP Markets Raw. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Equiti Micro vs FP Markets Raw
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Equiti Micro and FP Markets Raw?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Equiti Micro account?+
What is the Equiti Micro spread and commission?+
What is the Equiti Micro minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between Equiti Micro, Classic and Standard?+
What is the FP Markets Raw account?+
What is the FP Markets Raw spread?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
