
Trading Account Comparison: Equiti Microvs IC Markets Raw Pro
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Raw Pro
What Makes Equiti Micro Different from IC Markets Raw Pro?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
Equiti Micro
The Equiti Micro account provides a straightforward option for traders who prioritize accessibility over obtaining the tightest spreads. According to Broker Alarab data, spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips, with no separate trading commission, no minimum deposit and Market Execution. It should therefore be evaluated around its accessible structure while recognizing its wider spreads compared with other Equiti accounts.
IC Markets Raw Pro
The IC Markets Raw Pro account is one of the broker’s tight-spread options and is categorized by Broker Alarab for active traders. Spreads range from 0.0–0.1 pips, commission is $1.5 per lot, the minimum deposit is $200 and orders use Market Execution. This positions Raw Pro between Raw Pro+ and Raw Spread as an account that should be compared carefully on spread, commission and trading volume.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | Equiti Micro | IC Markets Raw Pro |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | Equiti | IC Markets |
| Account Name | Micro | Raw Pro |
| Account Type | cent | raw |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 1.8 – 2.5 | 0.0 - 0.1 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 1.8 | 0 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 2.1 | 0.05 |
| Advertised Commission | $0 | Not specified |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $0 | $200 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | FCA | CySEC | JSC | FSA | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:2000 | 1:500 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

Equiti
Micro

IC Markets
Raw Pro
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see Equiti Micro as an account that requires a more deliberate choice: it offers no minimum deposit and no separate commission, but its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest in our Equiti data. It should therefore be compared directly with Classic, which provides the same commission and deposit advantages with a tighter displayed spread range.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see IC Markets Raw Pro as an account that is best evaluated through direct comparison rather than isolated figures. Its 0.0–0.1 pip range is relevant to active traders, but the $1.5-per-lot commission should be compared directly with Raw Pro+ and the other Raw options. With a $200 minimum deposit, effective cost and trading volume become the key decision factors.
Account Advantages
- ✓No minimum deposit according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓No separate trading commission on the account
- ✓Straightforward pricing structure based primarily on spread
- ✓Does not require committing to a stated initial deposit amount
- ✓Provides an additional option when comparing Equiti account types before opening an account
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.0–0.1 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Defined commission of $1.5 per lot
- ✓Categorized for active traders in our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit is $200
- ✓Provides tight-spread Raw pricing for traders who prefer it over the Standard model
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among Equiti accounts in our data
- !Classic combines the same zero commission and no minimum deposit with a tighter spread range
- !Standard provides clearly tighter spreads in exchange for a $30 minimum deposit
- !Spread costs can become increasingly important as trading volume or frequency rises
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a separate $1.5-per-lot commission
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean zero trading cost
- !Commission is higher than Raw Pro+ in our data despite the same listed spread range
- !Traders need to compare several Raw options before determining the most suitable account
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders looking for an Equiti account with no minimum deposit
- •Users who prefer not to pay a separate per-lot commission
- •Traders comparing Micro with Classic before choosing an Equiti account
- •Users who prioritize a straightforward account structure over obtaining the tightest spreads
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders who prioritize a tight spread range
- •Traders who prefer Raw pricing with tighter spreads and a separate commission
- •Users comparing the cost of Raw Pro with Raw Pro+
- •Frequent traders who calculate transaction costs using actual lot volume
Detailed Account Analysis
Equiti Micro vs Classic: What Is the Real Difference?
This is the key comparison for Micro because neither account has a separate trading commission or minimum deposit in Broker Alarab data. The clearest difference is spread: Micro is listed at 1.8–2.5 pips, while Classic ranges from 1.4–1.8 pips. Classic therefore has a clear advantage in the displayed spread range. Traders specifically considering Micro should focus on whether the account type suits their needs, because zero commission and no minimum deposit do not give Micro a pricing advantage over Classic based on our figures.
Is the Equiti Micro Account Low Cost Because It Has Zero Commission?
No. The separate commission listed for Micro is $0, but that does not remove spread cost. Its 1.8–2.5 pip range is the widest among the Equiti accounts in our dataset, making spread an important component of total cost, particularly as trading frequency or volume increases. Cost-conscious traders should compare Micro with Classic and Standard rather than using zero commission as the only deciding factor, because both alternatives have tighter displayed spread ranges.
Equiti Micro vs Standard: Is the $30 Minimum Deposit Worth Paying?
Micro has no minimum deposit and offers 1.8–2.5 pip spreads with no separate commission. Standard introduces a $30 minimum deposit but narrows the displayed spread range to 1.2–1.6 pips while keeping commission at $0 according to our data. Traders able to meet the $30 requirement therefore have a clear reason to compare the two accounts from a spread-cost perspective. The trade-off is not commission, but entry requirement versus the displayed pricing range.
Detailed Account Analysis
IC Markets Raw Pro vs Raw Pro+: What Is the Difference?
According to Broker Alarab data, the accounts share several important characteristics: 0.0–0.1 pip spreads, a $200 minimum deposit and Market Execution. The clear difference in our table is commission. Raw Pro carries a $1.5-per-lot commission, while Raw Pro+ carries $1 per lot. Total traded lots therefore become important when comparing them. As volume rises, the cumulative effect of the $0.50-per-lot difference increases, making expected trading volume central to the comparison.
Is IC Markets Raw Pro Suitable for Active Traders?
Broker Alarab categorizes Raw Pro for active traders, and its 0.0–0.1 pip spread range is relevant to users who pay close attention to repeated entry and exit costs. Active trading also means the $1.5-per-lot commission repeats as volume increases. The tight spread should therefore not be evaluated alone. Total commission and spread costs should be calculated and compared with Standard and the other Raw accounts before determining whether Raw Pro fits the trader’s actual activity.
Raw Pro vs Raw Spread: Which Cost Structure Is Stronger?
Raw Pro uses 0.0–0.1 pip spreads with a $1.5-per-lot commission in our data, while Raw Spread uses 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Both have a $200 minimum deposit. These figures make comparison important, but suitability cannot be determined from one spread or commission figure alone. Trading volume, strategy and transaction frequency determine how much each pricing difference actually affects the trader.
Important details about the Equiti Micro account
Zero commission does not mean zero trading cost
Micro has no separate commission in our data, but spreads range from 1.8–2.5 pips. Spread therefore remains an important component when evaluating the cost of opening and closing positions.
No minimum deposit does not determine suitable trading capital
Broker Alarab data lists no minimum deposit for Micro. This improves accessibility, but it does not mean every balance is appropriate for a particular strategy, position size or level of risk.
Compare Micro with Classic before choosing
Both accounts have no separate commission and no minimum deposit in our data, but Classic has a tighter displayed spread range. This makes the Micro versus Classic comparison particularly important before selecting the account.
Important details about the IC Markets Raw Pro account
Raw Pro commission is $1.5 per lot in our data
Broker Alarab data lists a $1.5-per-lot commission for the account. It should be combined with the spread effect when calculating total trading cost.
A 0.0–0.1 pip spread does not mean cost-free trading
Even when the spread reaches the lower end of the listed range, commission remains part of the pricing structure. Spread and commission should therefore be evaluated together.
Raw Pro and Raw Pro+ require a direct comparison
Both accounts have the same spread range and minimum deposit in our data, while their commissions differ. Trading volume therefore becomes central to the comparison.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for Equiti Micro is 1.8 – 2.5, while IC Markets Raw Pro shows 0.0 - 0.1. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for Equiti Micro is $0, compared with $200 for IC Markets Raw Pro. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About Equiti Micro vs IC Markets Raw Pro
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between Equiti Micro and IC Markets Raw Pro?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the Equiti Micro account?+
What is the Equiti Micro spread and commission?+
What is the Equiti Micro minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between Equiti Micro, Classic and Standard?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro account?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
