
Trading Account Comparison: FP Markets Rawvs XM Ultra Low
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Ultra Low
What Makes FP Markets Raw Different from XM Ultra Low?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
FP Markets Raw
The FP Markets Raw account is the broker’s low-spread option and is categorized by Broker Alarab for scalpers and active traders. According to our data, spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips with a recorded average of 0.1 pip, commission is $6 per lot, the minimum deposit is $100 and orders use Market Execution. Raw differs from Standard primarily in how trading costs are divided between spreads and commission.
XM Ultra Low
The XM Ultra Low account targets traders looking for lower spreads while keeping a commission-free pricing structure. Based on Broker Alarab account data, spreads range from 0.6–1.0 pips, the minimum deposit is $5 and orders use Market Execution, making Ultra Low a strong alternative to Standard and an important account to compare directly with XM Zero on trading costs.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | FP Markets Raw | XM Ultra Low |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | FP Markets | XM |
| Account Name | Raw | Ultra Low |
| Account Type | raw | standard |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 - 0.3 | 0.6 – 1.0 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 0.6 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.1 | 0.8 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $100 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Classified as suitable for scalping | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | ASIC | CySEC | FSCA | FSA | FSC | CMA | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

FP Markets
Raw

XM
Ultra Low
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see FP Markets Raw as particularly relevant to traders prioritizing tight spreads, with its listed 0.0–0.3 pip range and 0.1-pip recorded average. However, the $6 per-lot commission is an essential cost component and should not be ignored. Evaluating Raw, especially against Standard, should therefore focus on expected total cost and trading volume rather than the spread figure alone.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see XM Ultra Low as one of the stronger XM options for traders seeking a balance between tighter spreads and commission-free pricing. Its 0.6–1.0 pip range is more competitive than Standard in our data, but highly active or cost-sensitive traders should still compare Ultra Low with Zero using total transaction cost rather than spread alone.
Account Advantages
- ✓Listed spreads range from 0.0–0.3 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Recorded average spread is 0.1 pip
- ✓Tighter listed spread range than the Standard account
- ✓Categorized for scalpers and active traders
- ✓The $100 minimum deposit is the same as Standard
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.6–1.0 pips based on Broker Alarab account data
- ✓No separate trading commission according to our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Tighter displayed spread range than XM Standard in our comparison data
- ✓Combines relatively low spreads with a simpler commission-free pricing model
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !A $6 per-lot trading commission applies according to our data
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean trading cost is zero
- !Higher total trading volume increases the cumulative impact of commission
- !Traders should compare both spread and commission with Standard rather than relying on the minimum spread alone
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The displayed spread range is not as tight as XM Zero in our account data
- !Active traders may need to compare total cost with the commission-based Zero account
- !The spread remains an important trading cost even without a separate commission
- !Choosing it based on the Ultra Low name alone can be misleading without comparing other XM accounts
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Scalpers according to Broker Alarab account categorization
- •Active traders who prioritize tight spreads
- •Users who prefer a pricing model that separates commission from the spread
- •Traders comparing Raw with Standard who can evaluate total cost based on their trading volume
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Traders looking for tighter spreads without a separate trading commission
- •Users who find the Standard account spread relatively high for their trading style
- •Traders who prefer simpler pricing over a commission-based account structure
- •Anyone comparing a lower-spread XM option with the XM Zero account before opening an account
Detailed Account Analysis
Does the FP Markets Raw Spread Start From 0.0 Pips?
Yes. The recorded minimum spread for FP Markets Raw is 0.0 pips, while the full listed range is 0.0–0.3 pips and the recorded average is 0.1 pip according to Broker Alarab data. The 0.0 figure does not mean trading is cost-free, however, because the account carries a $6 per-lot commission. Spread figures should therefore be read together with commission when evaluating costs.
FP Markets Raw vs Standard: Tighter Spreads or No Commission?
Raw and Standard use different pricing models. Raw has listed spreads of 0.0–0.3 pips with a $6 per-lot commission, while Standard has 1.0–1.5 pip spreads without a separate commission. Both accounts have a $100 minimum deposit. The comparison therefore centers on whether tighter spreads plus commission are more suitable for the trader’s expected volume and frequency than wider spreads without a separate commission.
Why Does Trading Volume Matter for FP Markets Raw Commission?
The recorded Raw commission is $6 per lot, making total traded lots an important factor when estimating costs. As cumulative trading volume increases, the commission component has a larger impact on total transaction costs. This is particularly relevant because the account is categorized for scalpers and active traders, trading styles that may involve greater transaction frequency than less active approaches.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Ultra Low vs Standard: Where Does Ultra Low Have the Advantage?
The clearest Ultra Low advantage appears when its spread is compared directly with Standard. Broker Alarab data lists Ultra Low at 0.6–1.0 pips versus 1.0–1.5 pips for Standard, while neither account has a separate trading commission and both have a $5 minimum deposit. Ultra Low therefore has a clear advantage in the displayed spread range in our dataset. Traders who do not specifically need another feature of Standard should compare Ultra Low first when reducing spread cost is a priority.
XM Ultra Low vs Zero: Which Account Costs Less?
This comparison is more complex because the accounts use different pricing models. Ultra Low has spreads of 0.6–1.0 pips with no separate commission in our data, while Zero is listed at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Zero cannot therefore be considered cheaper simply because its displayed spread is lower. Traders need to compare spread and commission together, especially when trading frequently or using larger position sizes.
Is the XM Ultra Low Account Good for Active Trading?
Ultra Low can be attractive to active traders because its displayed spread range is tighter than Standard in our data and there is no separate trading commission. Suitability still depends on trading style. As trade frequency increases, relatively small cost differences become more important and comparison with Zero becomes essential. Traders who prefer costs concentrated in the spread may find Ultra Low simpler, while others may find Zero more competitive after calculating their total transaction cost.
Important details about the FP Markets Raw account
Commission is $6 per lot
This commission is a core component of the Raw pricing model according to Broker Alarab data and should be evaluated alongside the spread when comparing Raw with Standard.
0.0 pips is the start of the spread range, not zero cost
The listed spread ranges from 0.0–0.3 pips with a 0.1-pip recorded average, but the separate commission means trading cost is not zero even when the spread reaches 0.0.
The minimum deposit is $100
Raw and Standard have the same recorded $100 minimum deposit. This figure represents an account requirement rather than a recommendation for appropriate trading capital.
Important details about the XM Ultra Low account
Ultra Low does not mean zero spread
Broker Alarab data lists the XM Ultra Low spread at 0.6–1.0 pips. Traders should therefore distinguish the Ultra Low name from the XM Zero account, which has a different displayed spread range and uses a per-lot commission model.
Compare total cost rather than spread alone
The lack of a separate commission makes Ultra Low pricing relatively easy to understand, but comparison with Zero should include both spread and commission. The account with the tighter spread is not automatically cheaper for every trade size or strategy.
Minimum deposit does not define suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Ultra Low, but this is an account requirement rather than a recommendation for trading capital. Suitable funding depends on position size, leverage, strategy and individual risk limits.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for FP Markets Raw is 0.0 - 0.3, while XM Ultra Low shows 0.6 – 1.0. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for FP Markets Raw is $100, compared with $5 for XM Ultra Low. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About FP Markets Raw vs XM Ultra Low
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between FP Markets Raw and XM Ultra Low?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the FP Markets Raw account?+
What is the FP Markets Raw spread?+
What is the FP Markets Raw commission and minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between FP Markets Raw and Standard?+
What is the XM Ultra Low account?+
What is the XM Ultra Low account spread and commission?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
