
Trading Account Comparison: IC Markets Raw Provs XM Micro
Explore differences in spreads, commissions, deposits and trading conditions, alongside a detailed review of each account's advantages and limitations.


Micro
What Makes IC Markets Raw Pro Different from XM Micro?
Before comparing the numbers, it is important to understand the purpose of each account and the conditions that may make it suitable for different traders.
IC Markets Raw Pro
The IC Markets Raw Pro account is one of the broker’s tight-spread options and is categorized by Broker Alarab for active traders. Spreads range from 0.0–0.1 pips, commission is $1.5 per lot, the minimum deposit is $200 and orders use Market Execution. This positions Raw Pro between Raw Pro+ and Raw Spread as an account that should be compared carefully on spread, commission and trading volume.
XM Micro
The XM Micro account is designed for traders who want to trade with smaller position sizes while using a live trading environment. Based on our account data, it has spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit, making it worth considering for beginners and traders focused on controlling position size and risk.
Compare Trading Accounts, Spreads, Commissions and Platforms
Review spreads, commissions, minimum deposits, trading platforms, execution methods and broker-level regulatory information.
01 — Basic Account Information
Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information.
Broker
Account Name
Account Type
Broker Regulatory Licenses
Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country.
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs
Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing.
Advertised Spread Range
Minimum Recorded Spread
Based on the available account information.
Average Recorded Spread
Advertised Commission
03 — Deposits and Execution
Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics.
Minimum Deposit
Order Execution Method
Trading Platforms
Available platforms may differ by account type.
04 — Account Features and Conditions
Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability.
Scalping Suitability
An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability.
05 — Broker Information and Regulation
Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account.
Listed Regulatory Licenses
Broker Maximum Leverage
Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity.
Open a Trading Account
Information is based on records available to Broker Alarab. Trading conditions may vary by account, country and legal entity.
| Comparison Criteria | IC Markets Raw Pro | XM Micro |
|---|---|---|
01 — Basic Account Information Compare the broker, account name, account classification and regulatory information. | ||
| Broker | IC Markets | XM |
| Account Name | Raw Pro | Micro |
| Account Type | raw | cent |
| Broker Regulatory Licenses Broker-level regulatory information. Verify which legal entity serves your country. | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
02 — Spreads and Trading Costs Compare the recorded trading costs without assuming undocumented pricing. | ||
| Advertised Spread Range | 0.0 - 0.1 | 1.0 – 1.5 |
| Minimum Recorded Spread Based on the available account information. | 0 | 1 |
| Average Recorded Spread | 0.05 | 1.2 |
| Advertised Commission | Not specified | $0 |
03 — Deposits and Execution Review account funding requirements and order execution characteristics. | ||
| Minimum Deposit | $200 | $5 |
| Order Execution Method | Market Execution | Market Execution |
| Trading Platforms Available platforms may differ by account type. | MT4 | MT5 | cTrader | TradingView | MT4 | MT5 |
04 — Account Features and Conditions Review relevant account characteristics and trading suitability. | ||
| Scalping Suitability An internal classification, not a guarantee of suitability. | Not classified in this category | Not classified in this category |
05 — Broker Information and Regulation Broker-level information does not guarantee that every license applies to the selected account. | ||
| Listed Regulatory Licenses | ASIC | CySEC | FSA | SCB | CySEC | ASIC | DFSA | FSCA | FSC |
| Broker Maximum Leverage Actual leverage may depend on the account, jurisdiction and legal entity. | 1:500 | 1:1000 |
| Open a Trading Account | Open Account ↗ | Open Account ↗ |
Broker Alarab's Assessment of Both Accounts
We review each account independently, highlighting strengths, limitations and the types of traders it may suit, without declaring an unsupported winner.

IC Markets
Raw Pro

XM
Micro
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see IC Markets Raw Pro as an account that is best evaluated through direct comparison rather than isolated figures. Its 0.0–0.1 pip range is relevant to active traders, but the $1.5-per-lot commission should be compared directly with Raw Pro+ and the other Raw options. With a $200 minimum deposit, effective cost and trading volume become the key decision factors.
Broker Alarab's Assessment
We see the XM Micro account as most relevant to beginners and traders who prioritize smaller position sizing over finding the tightest possible spread. Its $5 minimum deposit and commission-free structure are straightforward, but spread-sensitive or more active traders should compare Micro directly with XM Ultra Low and Zero before choosing an account.
Account Advantages
- ✓Spreads range from 0.0–0.1 pips according to Broker Alarab data
- ✓Defined commission of $1.5 per lot
- ✓Categorized for active traders in our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit is $200
- ✓Provides tight-spread Raw pricing for traders who prefer it over the Standard model
Account Advantages
- ✓Supports smaller trade sizing and more gradual control of market exposure
- ✓No separate trading commission based on our account data
- ✓Minimum deposit starts from $5
- ✓Can suit traders moving from demo to live trading
- ✓Provides a practical way to learn position sizing and risk control
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !Carries a separate $1.5-per-lot commission
- !A spread starting at 0.0 does not mean zero trading cost
- !Commission is higher than Raw Pro+ in our data despite the same listed spread range
- !Traders need to compare several Raw options before determining the most suitable account
Disadvantages and Considerations
- !The 1.0–1.5 pip spread is not the lowest available across XM account types
- !May be less attractive to active traders focused primarily on transaction costs
- !Smaller position sizes do not remove leverage or market risk
- !Should be compared with Ultra Low and Zero when tighter spreads are the priority
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Active traders who prioritize a tight spread range
- •Traders who prefer Raw pricing with tighter spreads and a separate commission
- •Users comparing the cost of Raw Pro with Raw Pro+
- •Frequent traders who calculate transaction costs using actual lot volume
Who Is This Account Suitable For?
- •Beginners who want to start live trading with smaller position sizes
- •Traders learning practical position sizing and money management
- •Users who prefer an account without a separate trading commission
- •Traders looking for an XM account with a $5 minimum deposit
Detailed Account Analysis
IC Markets Raw Pro vs Raw Pro+: What Is the Difference?
According to Broker Alarab data, the accounts share several important characteristics: 0.0–0.1 pip spreads, a $200 minimum deposit and Market Execution. The clear difference in our table is commission. Raw Pro carries a $1.5-per-lot commission, while Raw Pro+ carries $1 per lot. Total traded lots therefore become important when comparing them. As volume rises, the cumulative effect of the $0.50-per-lot difference increases, making expected trading volume central to the comparison.
Is IC Markets Raw Pro Suitable for Active Traders?
Broker Alarab categorizes Raw Pro for active traders, and its 0.0–0.1 pip spread range is relevant to users who pay close attention to repeated entry and exit costs. Active trading also means the $1.5-per-lot commission repeats as volume increases. The tight spread should therefore not be evaluated alone. Total commission and spread costs should be calculated and compared with Standard and the other Raw accounts before determining whether Raw Pro fits the trader’s actual activity.
Raw Pro vs Raw Spread: Which Cost Structure Is Stronger?
Raw Pro uses 0.0–0.1 pip spreads with a $1.5-per-lot commission in our data, while Raw Spread uses 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. Both have a $200 minimum deposit. These figures make comparison important, but suitability cannot be determined from one spread or commission figure alone. Trading volume, strategy and transaction frequency determine how much each pricing difference actually affects the trader.
Detailed Account Analysis
XM Micro vs Standard: What Is the Important Difference?
Micro and Standard have similar headline costs in our account data: both show spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit. The more meaningful distinction is how the account is used and the position sizes it supports. Micro is more relevant to traders who want smaller sizing and gradual control over exposure, while Standard is closer to conventional standard-lot trading. The decision should therefore be based on the position-sizing structure you actually need rather than simply assuming Micro is only a beginner account.
XM Micro vs Ultra Low: Is the Lower Spread Better?
Our account data shows Micro at 1.0–1.5 pips and Ultra Low at 0.6–1.0 pips, with both accounts carrying no separate trading commission and a $5 minimum deposit. Ultra Low can therefore look more attractive when spread is the main consideration, but Micro serves a different purpose through smaller trade sizing. Traders focused on controlling position size may still prefer Micro, while those becoming more sensitive to transaction costs should compare the effective cost of both accounts.
XM Micro vs Zero: Position Size or Pricing Model?
The difference between Micro and Zero goes beyond the account names. Micro uses a commission-free pricing structure with spreads of 1.0–1.5 pips, while our data lists Zero at 0.0–0.3 pips with a $7-per-lot commission. They therefore target different priorities. Micro can make more sense for traders focused on smaller sizing and simple pricing, whereas Zero becomes more relevant to spread-sensitive traders who are comfortable evaluating total transaction cost after commission.
Important details about the IC Markets Raw Pro account
Raw Pro commission is $1.5 per lot in our data
Broker Alarab data lists a $1.5-per-lot commission for the account. It should be combined with the spread effect when calculating total trading cost.
A 0.0–0.1 pip spread does not mean cost-free trading
Even when the spread reaches the lower end of the listed range, commission remains part of the pricing structure. Spread and commission should therefore be evaluated together.
Raw Pro and Raw Pro+ require a direct comparison
Both accounts have the same spread range and minimum deposit in our data, while their commissions differ. Trading volume therefore becomes central to the comparison.
Important details about the XM Micro account
A Micro account does not make trading low risk
The ability to use smaller trade sizes can help control exposure, but it does not prevent losses. Position size should still reflect account equity, leverage and the amount of capital a trader is prepared to risk.
Micro does not have the lowest XM spread in our data
Broker Alarab data lists Micro spreads at 1.0–1.5 pips. Ultra Low has a tighter displayed range, while Zero combines lower spreads with a commission, so pricing should be compared according to trading style.
Minimum deposit is not the same as suitable trading capital
Our data lists a $5 minimum deposit for XM Micro. That figure represents the account entry requirement and should not be interpreted as the amount of capital appropriate for every strategy or risk level.
How to Choose the Right Trading Account
Numbers alone are not enough. Account suitability depends on your trading strategy, capital, financial instruments and the conditions applicable to you.
Compare Spreads and Commissions Together
The recorded spread for IC Markets Raw Pro is 0.0 - 0.1, while XM Micro shows 1.0 – 1.5. Evaluating overall trading costs also requires checking commission rates, pricing units, instruments and position sizes.
Review Minimum Deposit Requirements
The recorded minimum deposit for IC Markets Raw Pro is $200, compared with $5 for XM Micro. A lower deposit requirement may provide more flexibility, but it does not automatically make an account better.
Compare Trading Platforms and Execution
Check which trading platforms each broker actually offers for the selected account, including MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5 where supported. Also review execution policies and potential slippage. Availability and conditions may vary by account and country.
Verify Regulation and Eligibility
Confirm the legal entity that will serve your account, the regulatory framework applicable to that entity, and whether the selected account is available in your country.
FAQs About IC Markets Raw Pro vs XM Micro
Answers to common questions about account comparisons, trading costs and account conditions.
What is the difference between IC Markets Raw Pro and XM Micro?+
Is the account with the lowest spread always better?+
Can I compare two accounts from the same broker?+
How can I verify the trading conditions?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro account?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro spread and commission?+
What is the IC Markets Raw Pro minimum deposit?+
What is the difference between IC Markets Raw Pro and Raw Pro+?+
What is the XM Micro account?+
What is the XM Micro account minimum deposit?+
Explore Both Trading Accounts in Detail
Review the full account information, compare trading conditions and verify the broker's requirements before opening an account.
