Ultima Markets vs MultiBank Group: Which Broker Is Better?

Ultima Markets appears in the available regulatory data through Ultima Markets ZA (Pty) Ltd, registered with the FSCA in South Africa under number 52497, and Ultima Markets Ltd, supervised by the financial regulator in Mauritius under number GB23201593. This structure is less diverse than that of brokers with entities authorised by the FCA, ASIC or CySEC.

Two regulated entities provide a legal framework for delivering services, but they do not automatically offer the same protection as brokers supervised by leading regulators. Leverage, account conditions, complaint procedures and legal protection may vary according to the entity assigned to the client during registration.

Before opening an Ultima Markets account, traders should verify the legal company name, licence number and permitted activities in the official register. This is particularly important for traders attracted by flexible accounts or promotional conditions, as it helps assess regulatory strength independently from the broker’s trading offer.

Ultima Markets states that client funds are separated from the company’s operating money under the requirements of the entity responsible for the account. Negative balance protection may also apply according to the relevant trading conditions, helping eligible clients limit liability arising from a negative account balance.

The current regulatory structure in our data includes entities supervised by FSCA in South Africa and FSC in Mauritius, without an FCA, ASIC or CySEC-regulated entity. Traders should carefully review the client agreement, withdrawal policy, complaint process and protection limits before depositing or maintaining a large balance with Ultima Markets.

MultiBank Group operates through a network of entities that includes MEX Australia Pty Ltd, authorised by ASIC under licence number 416279; MEX Asset Management GmbH, supervised by BaFin under number 119375; and MEX Europe Ltd, regulated by CySEC under licence number 430/23. The group also has an entity supervised by the SCA in the UAE and an international entity in Belize serving different markets.

The group’s multiple entities provide broad regulatory coverage, but they do not mean that every client receives the same protection available under ASIC, BaFin or CySEC. The actual entity may affect leverage, products, complaint procedures and investor protection, so traders should also verify the permitted scope of each legal company.

When researching MultiBank Group licences, traders should look beyond the number of licences and identify the entity shown in the client agreement. This is especially important for Arabic-speaking traders who may be directed to the UAE or international entity and need to balance global availability with the oversight applied to their account.

MultiBank Group entities apply client-money protection rules according to the regulator responsible for each legal company. These arrangements include separating eligible client funds from the group’s operating capital and business expenses, helping prevent client money from being used to finance the broker’s daily operations.

Fund custody rules, negative balance protection and investor compensation arrangements are not uniform across the ASIC, BaFin, CySEC, SCA and international Belize entities. Traders should verify the specific MEX or MultiBank company named in their client agreement instead of relying on the total number of licences held across the wider group.